Skip to main content

Politicians make promises on their stump — we watch and hold them accountable.

Help keep the record honest →Create an account
ChampionedClimate / Energy

Transition the United States off fossil fuels and to 100% clean and renewable energy by no later than 2050, via the 100 by '50 Act he co-introduced.

Sources (click to view full provenance)

Propose an edit to this promise's details

Suggest a sourced correction to the promise text, topic, scope, significance, or dates. Changing the promise text requires a source. Your suggestion is reviewed before it changes the record.

Sign in and complete the Contributor Agreement to propose an edit.

Assessments

evidence-backed verdicts

These are sourced verdicts from fact-checkers or community evidence reviews — not opinions.

ChampionedFact-checker reviewConfidence: 72%

The promise's ultimate end-state — the U.S. actually running on 100% clean/renewable energy by 2050 — cannot yet be judged (deadline ~24 years out; the U.S. has not transitioned off fossil fuels), so it is not FULL. But Merkley's record of leadership is verified and unambiguous: he was the LEAD sponsor and author of the 100 by '50 Act (S.987, 115th Congress) — introduced "for himself, Mr. Sanders, Mr. Markey, and Mr. Booker" — the first congressional bill envisioning a complete transition off fossil fuels to 100% clean and renewable energy by no later than 2050. His office's press release headline confirms the launch verbatim. That vehicle received no vote and died in committee (the normal fate of a minority-party bill), but Merkley sustained the campaign and voted Yea on the Inflation Reduction Act (Senate roll-call vote 325, Aug 7, 2022, H.R. 5376, 50-50 with the VP breaking the tie), which he praised as "the most significant piece of climate legislation ever passed through the U.S. Senate" that "puts us on a path to transition to clean and renewable energy." This is consistent, leading advocacy for the promised transition (CHAMPIONED), not box-checking. Confidence is held near 0.7 because the promised outcome remains aspirational and unmet and the flagship bill never advanced.

Your opinion on this assessment(clearly labeled opinion)

Sign in to vote.

Discussion

community opinions

Comments are user opinions — not verdicts. They do not affect the official assessment.

Sign in to join the discussion.

Propose a correction

community accountability

See an error in the promise text, status, significance, or missing source? Submit a sourced correction — a reviewer will evaluate and apply it if accurate. Your submission must cite evidence; unsourced changes are not accepted.

Sign in or create an account to propose a correction.

Debate

sourced community arguments

These are sourced community arguments — not StumpWatch assessments. Each cites a source and is community-contributed; it does not change the official status or rating above.

No arguments yet

Be the first to weigh in. Every argument cites a source and is reviewed before it publishes. Create an account to add one and help keep this promise honest.

Add a sourced argument

Cite a source for your point. Submissions are held for reviewer approval before they appear.

Sign in or create an account to add an argument.

StumpWatch is live, and the record is still growing. Many promises and positions aren’t tracked yet, and some features are still in beta. Add a sourced promise and help keep the record honest.

Help keep the record honest →