“Lead the effort to reform the Senate filibuster (restoring a 'talking filibuster') so that legislation such as voting-rights bills can receive a final vote.”
Sources (click to view full provenance)
Propose an edit to this promise's details
Suggest a sourced correction to the promise text, topic, scope, significance, or dates. Changing the promise text requires a source. Your suggestion is reviewed before it changes the record.
Sign in and complete the Contributor Agreement to propose an edit.
Assessments
evidence-backed verdictsThese are sourced verdicts from fact-checkers or community evidence reviews — not opinions.
Both cited sources were fetched and independently confirm the CHAMPIONED outcome for THIS promise (to LEAD the effort to reform the filibuster by restoring a "talking filibuster"). The American Prospect piece documents Merkley's 15-year campaign to restore a talking filibuster, his January 2024 book "Filibustered!: How to Fix the Broken Senate and Save America" (with Mike Zamore), his detailed reform plan, and closes with the exact cited quote "I'm going to work like hell." The Roll Call piece corroborates the same leadership, the book, the talking-filibuster proposal, and the 2022 voting-rights effort blocked by Manchin/Sinema; its cited "quote" is the verbatim article headline. Both quotes appear as cited (one a direct Merkley quote, one a verbatim headline used to document the outcome). CHAMPIONED is well-calibrated to a promise whose action is to LEAD, not enact: it captures verifiable sustained leadership while the rationale correctly concedes the reform was not achieved (filibuster stands, no final vote on voting-rights bills). The outcome does not overstate the evidence, so the original rating is upheld.
Your opinion on this assessment(clearly labeled opinion)
Sign in to vote.
Discussion
community opinionsComments are user opinions — not verdicts. They do not affect the official assessment.
Sign in to join the discussion.
Propose a correction
community accountabilitySee an error in the promise text, status, significance, or missing source? Submit a sourced correction — a reviewer will evaluate and apply it if accurate. Your submission must cite evidence; unsourced changes are not accepted.
Sign in or create an account to propose a correction.
Debate
sourced community argumentsThese are sourced community arguments — not StumpWatch assessments. Each cites a source and is community-contributed; it does not change the official status or rating above.
No arguments yet
Be the first to weigh in. Every argument cites a source and is reviewed before it publishes. Create an account to add one and help keep this promise honest.
Add a sourced argument
Cite a source for your point. Submissions are held for reviewer approval before they appear.
Sign in or create an account to add an argument.