“Committed to support free and fair trade that opens export markets for Idaho agricultural products and protects farmers from predatory practices.”
Sources (click to view full provenance)
Propose an edit to this promise's details
Suggest a sourced correction to the promise text, topic, scope, significance, or dates. Changing the promise text requires a source. Your suggestion is reviewed before it changes the record.
Sign in and complete the Contributor Agreement to propose an edit.
Assessments
evidence-backed verdictsThese are sourced verdicts from fact-checkers or community evidence reviews — not opinions.
All three cited sources hold up under adversarial verification and support a FULL (not CHAMPIONED) rating of this broad two-prong promise. PRONG A ("support free and fair trade that opens export markets for Idaho ag products"): the Senate roll-call primary confirms Risch voted Yea on H.R. 5430 (USMCA), which passed 89-10 on Jan. 16, 2020; the quote "Risch (R-ID), Yea" appears verbatim. USMCA is a concrete ratified outcome that opened/preserved markets for Idaho's top ag exports. Capital Press confirms Risch cosponsored the specialty-crop reporting bill targeting tariff/non-tariff barriers and export opportunities (the article lists King, Risch, Cantwell, Collins, Slotkin — matching the rating's substance, though the rating's quote is slightly reworded from the article's "Co-sponsors are Sens. Angus King... Jim Risch..."). PRONG B ("protects farmers from predatory practices"): S.912 (119th) — congress.gov returned 403, but web-search corroboration confirms the "Securing American Agriculture Act" was introduced by Ricketts with Risch as a cosponsor, directing USDA to assess U.S. ag dependency on China (a foreign-adversary/predatory-dependency protection). The CHAMPIONED downgrade is correct: Risch was a voter on USMCA and a cosponsor — not lead author — on both bills (Ricketts led S.912; King/Crapo led the specialty-crop bill), so primary-leadership evidence is absent. Minor deductions from the claimed 0.85: source-2 quote is a paraphrase rather than verbatim, and prong B's "predatory practices" match is a somewhat loose fit to a China-supply-chain bill. Neither undermines the underlying, primary-anchored outcome.
Your opinion on this assessment(clearly labeled opinion)
Sign in to vote.
Discussion
community opinionsComments are user opinions — not verdicts. They do not affect the official assessment.
Sign in to join the discussion.
Propose a correction
community accountabilitySee an error in the promise text, status, significance, or missing source? Submit a sourced correction — a reviewer will evaluate and apply it if accurate. Your submission must cite evidence; unsourced changes are not accepted.
Sign in or create an account to propose a correction.
Debate
sourced community argumentsThese are sourced community arguments — not StumpWatch assessments. Each cites a source and is community-contributed; it does not change the official status or rating above.
No arguments yet
Be the first to weigh in. Every argument cites a source and is reviewed before it publishes. Create an account to add one and help keep this promise honest.
Add a sourced argument
Cite a source for your point. Submissions are held for reviewer approval before they appear.
Sign in or create an account to add an argument.