“Join the bipartisan Kids Off Social Media Act, which sets a minimum age of 13 for social media accounts and bars algorithmically targeted content to users under 17.”
Sources (click to view full provenance)
Propose an edit to this promise's details
Suggest a sourced correction to the promise text, topic, scope, significance, or dates. Changing the promise text requires a source. Your suggestion is reviewed before it changes the record.
Sign in and complete the Contributor Agreement to propose an edit.
Assessments
evidence-backed verdictsThese are sourced verdicts from fact-checkers or community evidence reviews — not opinions.
Both cited PRIMARY sources are reachable and document exactly this outcome for this promise. The Senate Commerce Committee release names "Mark Warner (D-Va.)" as a cosponsor of the Kids Off Social Media Act and states the bill would "Prohibit children under the age of 13 from creating or maintaining social media accounts" and "Prohibit social media companies from pushing targeted content using algorithms to users under the age of 17" — the provision language matches the rating verbatim. The Schatz office page (lead sponsor's site) independently lists "Senator Mark Warner (D-Va.)" among the cosponsors and confirms the same age-13 and under-17 algorithmic provisions. The promise was to "join the bipartisan Kids Off Social Media Act," and Warner cosponsored it, which is precisely joining. FULL rather than CHAMPIONED is correct: Warner is one of several cosponsors of a bill led by Cruz and Schatz, not the lead sponsor/driver, so no leadership-level claim is asserted and none is needed. The evidence is not overstated. Rating upheld.
Your opinion on this assessment(clearly labeled opinion)
Sign in to vote.
Discussion
community opinionsComments are user opinions — not verdicts. They do not affect the official assessment.
Sign in to join the discussion.
Propose a correction
community accountabilitySee an error in the promise text, status, significance, or missing source? Submit a sourced correction — a reviewer will evaluate and apply it if accurate. Your submission must cite evidence; unsourced changes are not accepted.
Sign in or create an account to propose a correction.
Debate
sourced community argumentsThese are sourced community arguments — not StumpWatch assessments. Each cites a source and is community-contributed; it does not change the official status or rating above.
No arguments yet
Be the first to weigh in. Every argument cites a source and is reviewed before it publishes. Create an account to add one and help keep this promise honest.
Add a sourced argument
Cite a source for your point. Submissions are held for reviewer approval before they appear.
Sign in or create an account to add an argument.