“Continue to fight for commonsense gun reforms to eliminate loopholes, strengthen background checks, and ban assault rifles.”
Sources (click to view full provenance)
Propose an edit to this promise's details
Suggest a sourced correction to the promise text, topic, scope, significance, or dates. Changing the promise text requires a source. Your suggestion is reviewed before it changes the record.
Sign in and complete the Contributor Agreement to propose an edit.
Assessments
evidence-backed verdictsThese are sourced verdicts from fact-checkers or community evidence reviews — not opinions.
CHAMPIONED is verified and appropriate. The controlling leadership evidence is authorship, not merely a vote: Gillibrand's own Senate press release states verbatim, "the centerpiece of my bill, the Hadiya Pendleton and Nyasia Pryear-Yard Gun Trafficking and Crime Prevention Act, was included in the legislation," and the page confirms she "authored and first introduced" the underlying bill and that through it "trafficking firearms will become a federal crime." That is a concrete enacted win driven by legislation she authored — clear LEADERSHIP satisfying the CHAMPIONED bar for the loophole-elimination prong. (2) Background checks: Senate Roll Call 242 (measure titled "An act to make our communities safer," 65-33, Motion Agreed to) shows Gillibrand voting Yea on the Bipartisan Safer Communities Act, and her statement confirms it works "By strengthening background checks for purchasers under the age of 21... closing the boyfriend loophole." (3) Assault-weapons ban: S.736 is confirmed as the "Assault Weapons Ban of 2021" (Feinstein sponsor), which Gillibrand cosponsored and which stalled in the Judiciary Committee through ordinary process. Because the promise is framed as to "continue to fight for" these reforms — advocacy/leadership, not single-handed enactment — CHAMPIONED (actively led, with an authored bill enacted into law, but not every element achieved) is the correct rating over FULL. No quote was fabricated; every verified quote appears in its source.
Your opinion on this assessment(clearly labeled opinion)
Sign in to vote.
Discussion
community opinionsComments are user opinions — not verdicts. They do not affect the official assessment.
Sign in to join the discussion.
Propose a correction
community accountabilitySee an error in the promise text, status, significance, or missing source? Submit a sourced correction — a reviewer will evaluate and apply it if accurate. Your submission must cite evidence; unsourced changes are not accepted.
Sign in or create an account to propose a correction.
Debate
sourced community argumentsThese are sourced community arguments — not StumpWatch assessments. Each cites a source and is community-contributed; it does not change the official status or rating above.
No arguments yet
Be the first to weigh in. Every argument cites a source and is reviewed before it publishes. Create an account to add one and help keep this promise honest.
Add a sourced argument
Cite a source for your point. Submissions are held for reviewer approval before they appear.
Sign in or create an account to add an argument.