“Support passing the Protecting the Right to Organize (PRO) Act to empower workers and protect the right to join a union.”
Sources (click to view full provenance)
Propose an edit to this promise's details
Suggest a sourced correction to the promise text, topic, scope, significance, or dates. Changing the promise text requires a source. Your suggestion is reviewed before it changes the record.
Sign in and complete the Contributor Agreement to propose an edit.
Assessments
evidence-backed verdictsThese are sourced verdicts from fact-checkers or community evidence reviews — not opinions.
Both cited PRIMARY sources are reachable and each contains the attributed quote verbatim. Source 1 (gillibrand.senate.gov, "Gillibrand Calls on Senate to Pass the PRO Act") confirms the quote "I'm calling on the Senate to pass the PRO Act as soon as possible and I'll keep fighting until it becomes law." Source 2 (gillibrand.senate.gov, 06-30-2021 "push to protect workers' right to organize") confirms the quote "I am proud to join my Democratic colleagues in supporting this legislation and I will keep fighting to restore and strengthen workers' rights." The promise was to "support passing" the PRO Act, and the sources document exactly that: public advocacy for Senate passage plus (per Source 2's language) joining as a cosponsor with Democratic colleagues. FULL is correct and not overstated — she honored the support commitment; the bill's non-enactment (no Senate floor vote under the filibuster) is not attributable to her. CHAMPIONED is correctly NOT applied: the "join my Democratic colleagues in supporting this legislation" phrasing shows she acted as a cosponsor/advocate alongside many, not as the bill's lead author or floor driver. Same nonpartisan bar applied; no reason to downgrade toward UNRATABLE.
Your opinion on this assessment(clearly labeled opinion)
Sign in to vote.
Discussion
community opinionsComments are user opinions — not verdicts. They do not affect the official assessment.
Sign in to join the discussion.
Propose a correction
community accountabilitySee an error in the promise text, status, significance, or missing source? Submit a sourced correction — a reviewer will evaluate and apply it if accurate. Your submission must cite evidence; unsourced changes are not accepted.
Sign in or create an account to propose a correction.
Debate
sourced community argumentsThese are sourced community arguments — not StumpWatch assessments. Each cites a source and is community-contributed; it does not change the official status or rating above.
No arguments yet
Be the first to weigh in. Every argument cites a source and is reviewed before it publishes. Create an account to add one and help keep this promise honest.
Add a sourced argument
Cite a source for your point. Submissions are held for reviewer approval before they appear.
Sign in or create an account to add an argument.