“Cap the out-of-pocket cost of insulin at $35 per month for Americans, by passing legislation such as the Affordable Insulin Now Act.”
Sources (click to view full provenance)
Propose an edit to this promise's details
Suggest a sourced correction to the promise text, topic, scope, significance, or dates. Changing the promise text requires a source. Your suggestion is reviewed before it changes the record.
Sign in and complete the Contributor Agreement to propose an edit.
Assessments
evidence-backed verdictsThese are sourced verdicts from fact-checkers or community evidence reviews — not opinions.
Both cited sources were fetched and verify the PARTIAL rating. (1) Baldwin's Senate press release contains the cited quote verbatim and confirms the enacted $35 insulin cap applies to "seniors on Medicare" only — matching the rating's central claim. (2) The ABC News article contains all three sentences of the cited quote word-for-word, confirming the private-insurance $35 cap (Warnock amendment) failed 57-43 (needed 60 votes) while the parliamentarian allowed the $35 cap to remain for Medicare beneficiaries. The evidence supports PARTIAL exactly: a real portion (Medicare cap) became law via the Inflation Reduction Act, while the full "for Americans"/privately-insured scope the promise targeted did not. The outcome does not overstate the evidence, and correctly avoids FULL/CHAMPIONED (Baldwin was a cosponsor, not lead) and ATTEMPTED (part actually became law). The abcnews.com URL resolved to genuine ABC News content with historically accurate vote figures.
Your opinion on this assessment(clearly labeled opinion)
Sign in to vote.
Discussion
community opinionsComments are user opinions — not verdicts. They do not affect the official assessment.
Sign in to join the discussion.
Propose a correction
community accountabilitySee an error in the promise text, status, significance, or missing source? Submit a sourced correction — a reviewer will evaluate and apply it if accurate. Your submission must cite evidence; unsourced changes are not accepted.
Sign in or create an account to propose a correction.
Debate
sourced community argumentsThese are sourced community arguments — not StumpWatch assessments. Each cites a source and is community-contributed; it does not change the official status or rating above.
No arguments yet
Be the first to weigh in. Every argument cites a source and is reviewed before it publishes. Create an account to add one and help keep this promise honest.
Add a sourced argument
Cite a source for your point. Submissions are held for reviewer approval before they appear.
Sign in or create an account to add an argument.