“Lead and pass the Women's Health Protection Act to codify Roe v. Wade and restore/guarantee the right to abortion access nationwide.”
Sources (click to view full provenance)
Propose an edit to this promise's details
Suggest a sourced correction to the promise text, topic, scope, significance, or dates. Changing the promise text requires a source. Your suggestion is reviewed before it changes the record.
Sign in and complete the Contributor Agreement to propose an edit.
Assessments
evidence-backed verdictsThese are sourced verdicts from fact-checkers or community evidence reviews — not opinions.
Independently verified. Baldwin was a lead Senate sponsor/co-introducer of the Women's Health Protection Act, including the 118th Congress reintroduction (S.701, introduced March 2023) confirmed via Congress.gov/GovTrack, and multiple prior versions. Press releases from her own office and from Sen. Murray's office both describe Baldwin as a lead introducer ('Murray, Baldwin, Schumer, Blumenthal Lead 45 Senators in Introducing WHPA'), which is activity well beyond a single supporting vote. However, the bill did NOT pass: the Senate blocked it 49-51 on May 11, 2022 (Manchin + all Republicans opposed), it never cleared the 60-vote filibuster threshold, and it did not become law in the 118th Congress. Leading but not achieving enactment matches CHAMPIONED (+0.75), not FULL (never passed) and not ATTEMPTED (she led, not merely supported). Nonpartisan check: the same lead-sponsor-of-a-failed-bill record would earn CHAMPIONED for a member of either party. Sources verified real and on-point.
Your opinion on this assessment(clearly labeled opinion)
Sign in to vote.
Discussion
community opinionsComments are user opinions — not verdicts. They do not affect the official assessment.
Sign in to join the discussion.
Propose a correction
community accountabilitySee an error in the promise text, status, significance, or missing source? Submit a sourced correction — a reviewer will evaluate and apply it if accurate. Your submission must cite evidence; unsourced changes are not accepted.
Sign in or create an account to propose a correction.
Debate
sourced community argumentsThese are sourced community arguments — not StumpWatch assessments. Each cites a source and is community-contributed; it does not change the official status or rating above.
No arguments yet
Be the first to weigh in. Every argument cites a source and is reviewed before it publishes. Create an account to add one and help keep this promise honest.
Add a sourced argument
Cite a source for your point. Submissions are held for reviewer approval before they appear.
Sign in or create an account to add an argument.