“Deliver clean drinking water for Wisconsin communities and address PFAS 'forever chemicals' contamination in drinking water.”
Sources (click to view full provenance)
Propose an edit to this promise's details
Suggest a sourced correction to the promise text, topic, scope, significance, or dates. Changing the promise text requires a source. Your suggestion is reviewed before it changes the record.
Sign in and complete the Contributor Agreement to propose an edit.
Assessments
evidence-backed verdictsThese are sourced verdicts from fact-checkers or community evidence reviews — not opinions.
All three cited PRIMARY sources (baldwin.senate.gov) are reachable, support the promise topic, and contain the quoted language verbatim. The CHAMPIONED (leadership) bar is met: Source 2 documents Baldwin as lead co-sponsor/author (with Sen. Collins) of the bipartisan Healthy H2O Act (introduced 3/15/2023), which creates USDA grants for water testing and PFAS/lead/nitrate treatment for rural households — genuine legislative authorship, not a mere vote. Source 3 shows her securing $1.6M in appropriations for Eau Claire PFAS remediation (she "secured the funding" as part of the 2023 funding bill — earmark-level leadership, again beyond a vote). Source 1 documents delivery of $119.6M in Wisconsin clean-drinking-water funding covering both lead-pipe replacement and PFAS. Together these satisfy both halves of the promise (clean water for Wisconsin communities + addressing PFAS) with demonstrated leadership. Confidence held at 0.82 because the Healthy H2O Act itself was not yet fully enacted as of mid-2026 (pending Farm Bill), though the appropriations funding was enacted and delivered; Source 1 by itself reads as funding-announcement rather than authorship, so the leadership finding rests primarily on Sources 2 and 3.
Your opinion on this assessment(clearly labeled opinion)
Sign in to vote.
Discussion
community opinionsComments are user opinions — not verdicts. They do not affect the official assessment.
Sign in to join the discussion.
Propose a correction
community accountabilitySee an error in the promise text, status, significance, or missing source? Submit a sourced correction — a reviewer will evaluate and apply it if accurate. Your submission must cite evidence; unsourced changes are not accepted.
Sign in or create an account to propose a correction.
Debate
sourced community argumentsThese are sourced community arguments — not StumpWatch assessments. Each cites a source and is community-contributed; it does not change the official status or rating above.
No arguments yet
Be the first to weigh in. Every argument cites a source and is reviewed before it publishes. Create an account to add one and help keep this promise honest.
Add a sourced argument
Cite a source for your point. Submissions are held for reviewer approval before they appear.
Sign in or create an account to add an argument.