“Pledged not to accept his federal salary during a government shutdown and to return that money to the U.S. Treasury.”
Sources (click to view full provenance)
Propose an edit to this promise's details
Suggest a sourced correction to the promise text, topic, scope, significance, or dates. Changing the promise text requires a source. Your suggestion is reviewed before it changes the record.
Sign in and complete the Contributor Agreement to propose an edit.
Assessments
evidence-backed verdictsThese are sourced verdicts from fact-checkers or community evidence reviews — not opinions.
Adversarial verification confirms the PARTIAL rating. (1) Senate.gov PRIMARY source is reachable and the pledge quote is a verbatim exact match — the recorded promise explicitly names the Treasury as the destination: "I will not accept my federal salary in the event that the government shuts down – and I'll return that money to the Treasury." (2) Roll Call 2019 is reachable and documents the actual 2018-19 outcome; the verbatim text reads "Blumenthal pledged to donate the salary he earns during the shutdown to Homes For The Brave, which provides housing for the homeless with an emphasis on veterans. 'Least I can do,' Blumenthal said." The rating's quote is a light paraphrase but preserves the load-bearing facts (donated to a charity, NOT the Treasury) and the genuine verbatim phrase "Least I can do" — not fabricated. (3) The 2013 tweet was not directly fetchable (X returns HTTP 402 to scrapers), but an independent WebSearch surfaced the exact tweet and confirmed its text verbatim ("During #shutdown, I'll donate my pay to Wounded Warrior Project @wwpinc..."), again a charity rather than the Treasury. Both real post-pledge shutdowns show the same pattern: he gave up his pay (honoring the substantive core) but redirected it to charity rather than returning it to the Treasury as specifically promised. That is precisely PARTIAL — not FULL (a Treasury return never occurred) and not broken (he did forgo the salary). The outcome is supported and not overstated.
Your opinion on this assessment(clearly labeled opinion)
Sign in to vote.
Discussion
community opinionsComments are user opinions — not verdicts. They do not affect the official assessment.
Sign in to join the discussion.
Propose a correction
community accountabilitySee an error in the promise text, status, significance, or missing source? Submit a sourced correction — a reviewer will evaluate and apply it if accurate. Your submission must cite evidence; unsourced changes are not accepted.
Sign in or create an account to propose a correction.
Debate
sourced community argumentsThese are sourced community arguments — not StumpWatch assessments. Each cites a source and is community-contributed; it does not change the official status or rating above.
No arguments yet
Be the first to weigh in. Every argument cites a source and is reviewed before it publishes. Create an account to add one and help keep this promise honest.
Add a sourced argument
Cite a source for your point. Submissions are held for reviewer approval before they appear.
Sign in or create an account to add an argument.