“Committed to continue combating drug abuse in West Virginia at both the state and federal levels.”
Sources (click to view full provenance)
Propose an edit to this promise's details
Suggest a sourced correction to the promise text, topic, scope, significance, or dates. Changing the promise text requires a source. Your suggestion is reviewed before it changes the record.
Sign in and complete the Contributor Agreement to propose an edit.
Assessments
evidence-backed verdictsThese are sourced verdicts from fact-checkers or community evidence reviews — not opinions.
All three cited sources were fetched and verified. (1) Senate Roll Call #221 confirms Capito voted Yea on H.R. 6, the SUPPORT for Patients and Communities Act, 98-1 on Oct. 3, 2018 — quote and details match exactly. (2) Capito's own press release contains the cited quote verbatim ("I helped change the state grant formula in the Labor-HHS government funding bill, and the benefits of that change are evident today...") and announces $35,384,899 for West Virginia, documenting a self-driven, WV-targeted action (authoring grant-formula language) that goes beyond routine voting. (3) The Addiction Policy Forum page confirms the 2025 Legislator of the Year Award with the exact title, and documents her appropriations leadership on SOR/RCORP/NIH programs plus WV being "particularly hard-hit" — independent recognition of leadership. The sources jointly substantiate the CHAMPIONED bar (led/drove combating drug abuse for WV at the federal level, channeling resources to the state) rather than overstating it. No source was unreachable, no quote was fabricated, and the outcome is not overstated by the cited evidence.
Your opinion on this assessment(clearly labeled opinion)
Sign in to vote.
Discussion
community opinionsComments are user opinions — not verdicts. They do not affect the official assessment.
Sign in to join the discussion.
Propose a correction
community accountabilitySee an error in the promise text, status, significance, or missing source? Submit a sourced correction — a reviewer will evaluate and apply it if accurate. Your submission must cite evidence; unsourced changes are not accepted.
Sign in or create an account to propose a correction.
Debate
sourced community argumentsThese are sourced community arguments — not StumpWatch assessments. Each cites a source and is community-contributed; it does not change the official status or rating above.
No arguments yet
Be the first to weigh in. Every argument cites a source and is reviewed before it publishes. Create an account to add one and help keep this promise honest.
Add a sourced argument
Cite a source for your point. Submissions are held for reviewer approval before they appear.
Sign in or create an account to add an argument.