“Committed to working to ensure North Dakota producers have the opportunity to give direct input on the next farm bill.”
Sources (click to view full provenance)
Propose an edit to this promise's details
Suggest a sourced correction to the promise text, topic, scope, significance, or dates. Changing the promise text requires a source. Your suggestion is reviewed before it changes the record.
Sign in and complete the Contributor Agreement to propose an edit.
Assessments
evidence-backed verdictsThese are sourced verdicts from fact-checkers or community evidence reviews — not opinions.
Both cited PRIMARY sources (official hoeven.senate.gov releases) are reachable and both quotes appear verbatim. Source 1 (May 23, 2023) is titled "Hoeven Holds Farm Bill Roundtable with Red River Valley Producers, Agribusinesses" and confirms the quote "the latest in the senator's efforts to ensure the state's farmers, ranchers and agribusinesses have the opportunity to provide direct input" — the page shows Hoeven personally convening and hosting the input session, which is genuine leadership of exactly the promised action (creating direct-input opportunities), not a mere vote or passive support. Source 2 (Dec 16, 2023) confirms the quote "Today's meeting comes as part of Hoeven's ongoing efforts to provide North Dakota farmers and ranchers with the opportunity to give direct feedback as work continues on the next farm bill"; here Hoeven addressed an event the Farmers Union hosted (participation), but it is framed as part of a sustained, self-driven effort. Because this is a process/engagement promise and Hoeven personally originated and hosted his own farm-bill input roundtable (Source 1) as part of a documented ongoing series, the LEADERSHIP bar for CHAMPIONED is met and the outcome is not overstated. (Note: the rationale's added claim about organizing Boozman visits is not corroborated by these two cited sources, but the core CHAMPIONED case stands on the verified evidence.)
Your opinion on this assessment(clearly labeled opinion)
Sign in to vote.
Discussion
community opinionsComments are user opinions — not verdicts. They do not affect the official assessment.
Sign in to join the discussion.
Propose a correction
community accountabilitySee an error in the promise text, status, significance, or missing source? Submit a sourced correction — a reviewer will evaluate and apply it if accurate. Your submission must cite evidence; unsourced changes are not accepted.
Sign in or create an account to propose a correction.
Debate
sourced community argumentsThese are sourced community arguments — not StumpWatch assessments. Each cites a source and is community-contributed; it does not change the official status or rating above.
No arguments yet
Be the first to weigh in. Every argument cites a source and is reviewed before it publishes. Create an account to add one and help keep this promise honest.
Add a sourced argument
Cite a source for your point. Submissions are held for reviewer approval before they appear.
Sign in or create an account to add an argument.