“Co-introduced the National Adoption and Foster Care Home Study Act to create a national standard and database for home studies, intended to bring greater uniformity and transparency to matching children with foster and adoptive families across states.”
Sources (click to view full provenance)
Propose an edit to this promise's details
Suggest a sourced correction to the promise text, topic, scope, significance, or dates. Changing the promise text requires a source. Your suggestion is reviewed before it changes the record.
Sign in and complete the Contributor Agreement to propose an edit.
Assessments
evidence-backed verdictsThese are sourced verdicts from fact-checkers or community evidence reviews — not opinions.
The load-bearing PRIMARY source (Lankford's official Senate press release) is fully reachable and directly supports the promise: Lankford co-introduced the National Adoption and Foster Care Home Study Act on 2019-06-19 with Gillibrand, Huffman, and Bacon; it describes both the national standard and the National Home Study Database; and the cited quote appears VERBATIM. The two other cited URLs (GovTrack S.1912, Congress.gov S.2167) returned HTTP 403 to my fetcher, but these are bot-blocks on live, legitimate sites, and I independently corroborated their content via search: S.1912 introduced 2019-06-19 by Gillibrand for herself and Lankford; S.2167 title confirmed verbatim; three-Congress repeat co-introduction (S.684/2017, S.1912/2019, S.2167/2021) confirmed, none enacted. CHAMPIONED does not overstate — sustained co-introduction is verified and the failed goal is correctly acknowledged. Held at 0.7 because two cited URLs were confirmed only indirectly.
Your opinion on this assessment(clearly labeled opinion)
Sign in to vote.
Discussion
community opinionsComments are user opinions — not verdicts. They do not affect the official assessment.
Sign in to join the discussion.
Propose a correction
community accountabilitySee an error in the promise text, status, significance, or missing source? Submit a sourced correction — a reviewer will evaluate and apply it if accurate. Your submission must cite evidence; unsourced changes are not accepted.
Sign in or create an account to propose a correction.
Debate
sourced community argumentsThese are sourced community arguments — not StumpWatch assessments. Each cites a source and is community-contributed; it does not change the official status or rating above.
No arguments yet
Be the first to weigh in. Every argument cites a source and is reviewed before it publishes. Create an account to add one and help keep this promise honest.
Add a sourced argument
Cite a source for your point. Submissions are held for reviewer approval before they appear.
Sign in or create an account to add an argument.