“As lead Senate sponsor of the Judiciary Act, committed to expanding the U.S. Supreme Court by adding four seats to create a 13-justice Court.”
Sources (click to view full provenance)
Propose an edit to this promise's details
Suggest a sourced correction to the promise text, topic, scope, significance, or dates. Changing the promise text requires a source. Your suggestion is reviewed before it changes the record.
Sign in and complete the Contributor Agreement to propose an edit.
Assessments
evidence-backed verdictsThese are sourced verdicts from fact-checkers or community evidence reviews — not opinions.
Independently verified. Markey is the named sponsor of record of S.1616, the Judiciary Act of 2023, which he introduced in the Senate on May 16, 2023 to amend Title 28 to add four seats (12 associate + 1 chief = 13 justices). Confirmed via govinfo.gov (sponsor Edward J. Markey; 'allow for 12 associate justices'; introduced 5/16/2023, referred to Committee on the Judiciary) and his own Senate press release, which lists him as a lead sponsor and describes expanding the Court by four seats to a 13-justice bench. He led the reintroduction rollout publicly. The bill was read twice and referred to the Judiciary Committee and never advanced to a vote or became law (Congress.gov latest action), so it is not FULL/PARTIAL; but he actively led and drove the effort beyond a single supporting vote, which is exactly CHAMPIONED. The non-advancement reflects lack of a Senate majority for court expansion, not any retreat by Markey. Same standard would yield CHAMPIONED for a sponsor of either party who introduced and led a signature bill that died in committee. Prior rating's sources are real and support the outcome; Congress.gov and LegiScan block automated fetch (HTTP 403) but are the live canonical records and are corroborated by govinfo.gov, which I fetched successfully.
Your opinion on this assessment(clearly labeled opinion)
Sign in to vote.
Discussion
community opinionsComments are user opinions — not verdicts. They do not affect the official assessment.
Sign in to join the discussion.
Propose a correction
community accountabilitySee an error in the promise text, status, significance, or missing source? Submit a sourced correction — a reviewer will evaluate and apply it if accurate. Your submission must cite evidence; unsourced changes are not accepted.
Sign in or create an account to propose a correction.
Debate
sourced community argumentsThese are sourced community arguments — not StumpWatch assessments. Each cites a source and is community-contributed; it does not change the official status or rating above.
No arguments yet
Be the first to weigh in. Every argument cites a source and is reviewed before it publishes. Create an account to add one and help keep this promise honest.
Add a sourced argument
Cite a source for your point. Submissions are held for reviewer approval before they appear.
Sign in or create an account to add an argument.