Independent re-check. SOURCE AUDIT: all three sources cited by the prior researcher are real, live, and accurately quoted — the moran.senate.gov agriculture issue page carries the four planks nearly verbatim ("I will continue my past efforts to improve crop insurance", "promote additional demand for our commodities through trade", "support livestock producers", "look for ways we can address high energy costs"), and both news releases (July 1, 2026 phosphate duties; Nov 23, 2021 meatpackers) exist with the quoted text. Nothing was invented. OUTCOME RE-TEST plank by plank: (1) CROP INSURANCE — landed, in part. Moran voted Yea on passage of H.R. 1 (Senate roll call 119-1-372, July 1, 2025, 50-50 + VP), which per Kansas Wheat's July 16, 2025 podcast summary delivered "updated reference prices in Title I of the Farm Bill and expanded crop insurance options." He publicly names crop insurance the single most important federal ag program and his top farm-bill priority (RFD-TV, Jan 8, 2025). A comprehensive farm bill still had not passed as of the June 2026 Farm Bill 2.0 draft. (2) TRADE DEMAND — MIXED, with a real contrary record the prior rating missed. He cosponsored the Trade Review Act of 2025 with Grassley and Cantwell, met Kansas Farm Bureau/Corn/Sorghum/Soybeans over tariffs, pushed bilateral agreements, and hosted a May 27, 2026 trade roundtable with the USDA Under Secretary. But when given clean up-or-down votes he voted NAY on S.J.Res.81 (roll call 119-1-594, Oct 29, 2025, passed 52-48) and NAY on S.J.Res.88 terminating the global tariff emergency (roll call 119-1-600, Oct 30, 2025, passed 51-47) — only four Republicans voted yes — despite writing in his own April 7, 2025 newsletter that "American tariffs are often met with reciprocal tariffs, which are frequently aimed at our farmers." That is an affirmative vote against the direction of this plank. (3) LIVESTOCK — thin: a 2021 USDA grant announcement, not his own enacted measure. (4) ENERGY/INPUT COSTS — advocacy only (E-15 expansion, pressing Commerce/USDA on input tariffs, phosphate duty suspension), and by his own July 1, 2026 statement farmers "continue to struggle with stubbornly high input prices." NET: real engagement on all four planks with concrete results on two, one plank contradicted by his own roll-call votes, one unresolved by his own admission. That is "kept some but not all" — PARTIAL. Not CHAMPIONED: in this window he was a cosponsor and advocate rather than the lead driver of any enacted change, and he voted contrary on the trade plank. Not ATTEMPTED or IGNORED: measurable things did land. PARTISAN-SYMMETRY CHECK: a Democrat who named a priority, voted for a bill that enacted part of it, advocated on the rest, but voted twice to preserve the policy harming the plank he pledged to advance would get PARTIAL under this same standard. Confidence raised from 0.60 to 0.72 because the legislative record was independently verified via senate.gov roll calls (congress.gov 403s, so votes were confirmed from the Senate's own roll-call pages instead); the prior 0.60 reflected an unverified vote record. Verdict is REVISE rather than CONFIRM because the outcome now rests on a materially different and larger evidence base, including contrary votes the original rating did not surface.