“Reintroduce the bipartisan border security bill he negotiated and seek to bring it to a Senate floor vote.”
Sources (click to view full provenance)
Propose an edit to this promise's details
Suggest a sourced correction to the promise text, topic, scope, significance, or dates. Changing the promise text requires a source. Your suggestion is reviewed before it changes the record.
Sign in and complete the Contributor Agreement to propose an edit.
Assessments
evidence-backed verdictsThese are sourced verdicts from fact-checkers or community evidence reviews — not opinions.
All three cited sources are reachable and each supports the outcome for this specific promise, and the quotes appear verbatim. (1) The Senate official roll call vote 182 confirms a floor vote on S. 4361 — cloture on the motion to proceed — on May 23, 2024, rejected 43-50. (2) Murphy's official Senate press release is titled verbatim "Murphy Reintroduces Bipartisan Border Security Legislation, Pushes For Another Vote On Senate Floor," documenting both promise components (reintroduce + seek a floor vote); the cited Schumer quote is a verbatim substring of the actual sentence. (3) ABC News independently confirms the 43-50 tally and that Murphy, Sinema, and Lankford authored/negotiated the bill. LEADERSHIP is independently confirmed: a web search across GovTrack/LegiScan/BillSponsor establishes Murphy as the SPONSOR of S.4361, introduced May 16, 2024, and as one of three principal authors. He authored, negotiated, reintroduced, and drove the push for the floor vote — real leadership, not a mere vote or expression of support — which supports CHAMPIONED over FULL. Both promise components were fulfilled; the bill's failure to advance does not affect the rating because passage was never part of the promise. CHAMPIONED upheld.
Your opinion on this assessment(clearly labeled opinion)
Sign in to vote.
Discussion
community opinionsComments are user opinions — not verdicts. They do not affect the official assessment.
Sign in to join the discussion.
Propose a correction
community accountabilitySee an error in the promise text, status, significance, or missing source? Submit a sourced correction — a reviewer will evaluate and apply it if accurate. Your submission must cite evidence; unsourced changes are not accepted.
Sign in or create an account to propose a correction.
Debate
sourced community argumentsThese are sourced community arguments — not StumpWatch assessments. Each cites a source and is community-contributed; it does not change the official status or rating above.
No arguments yet
Be the first to weigh in. Every argument cites a source and is reviewed before it publishes. Create an account to add one and help keep this promise honest.
Add a sourced argument
Cite a source for your point. Submissions are held for reviewer approval before they appear.
Sign in or create an account to add an argument.