“Committed to pass the Wage Theft Prevention and Wage Recovery Act to strengthen federal protections and help workers recover wages withheld by employers.”
Sources (click to view full provenance)
Propose an edit to this promise's details
Suggest a sourced correction to the promise text, topic, scope, significance, or dates. Changing the promise text requires a source. Your suggestion is reviewed before it changes the record.
Sign in and complete the Contributor Agreement to propose an edit.
Assessments
evidence-backed verdictsThese are sourced verdicts from fact-checkers or community evidence reviews — not opinions.
All four cited sources are reachable and each supports the CHAMPIONED outcome with its quote appearing verbatim. (1) GovInfo BILLS-117s4174is confirms Murray as lead Senate sponsor of the Wage Theft Prevention and Wage Recovery Act on the promise date (2022-05-10): the intro line "Mrs. Murray (for herself, Mr. Schatz, Mr. Markey, Mr. Wyden, Ms. Cantwell, ...) introduced the following bill" appears exactly. (2) The HELP Committee release (May 10, 2022) matches the promise date and carries the attributed Murray quote about no worker being cheated out of earned pay, documenting her introduction of the Act. (3) The Murray Senate release headline "Murray, DeLauro, Scott Reintroduce Bicameral Legislation to Combat Wage Theft, Strengthen Workers' Rights" (the cited quote) is confirmed verbatim, evidencing reintroduction in the 118th Congress. (4) Quiver Quantitative confirms the 119th-Congress reintroduction, "This bill was received on 2026-06-24, and currently has 25 cosponsors." CHAMPIONED is properly calibrated: Murray authored and led this bill as Senate lead sponsor across three consecutive Congresses, which exceeds passive ATTEMPTED, and it is correctly NOT rated FULL because the bill has never passed either chamber. The evidence does not overstate the outcome. Rating upheld.
Your opinion on this assessment(clearly labeled opinion)
Sign in to vote.
Discussion
community opinionsComments are user opinions — not verdicts. They do not affect the official assessment.
Sign in to join the discussion.
Propose a correction
community accountabilitySee an error in the promise text, status, significance, or missing source? Submit a sourced correction — a reviewer will evaluate and apply it if accurate. Your submission must cite evidence; unsourced changes are not accepted.
Sign in or create an account to propose a correction.
Debate
sourced community argumentsThese are sourced community arguments — not StumpWatch assessments. Each cites a source and is community-contributed; it does not change the official status or rating above.
No arguments yet
Be the first to weigh in. Every argument cites a source and is reviewed before it publishes. Create an account to add one and help keep this promise honest.
Add a sourced argument
Cite a source for your point. Submissions are held for reviewer approval before they appear.
Sign in or create an account to add an argument.