“Committed to keep working to address PFAS contamination, introducing the Veterans Exposed to Toxic PFAS (VET PFAS) Act to guarantee VA health care for veterans and families exposed to PFAS chemicals.”
Sources (click to view full provenance)
Propose an edit to this promise's details
Suggest a sourced correction to the promise text, topic, scope, significance, or dates. Changing the promise text requires a source. Your suggestion is reviewed before it changes the record.
Sign in and complete the Contributor Agreement to propose an edit.
Assessments
evidence-backed verdictsThese are sourced verdicts from fact-checkers or community evidence reviews — not opinions.
All three cited sources verify the CHAMPIONED outcome for this promise. (1) The peters.senate.gov press release (April 4, 2019) opens exactly with the cited sentence naming Peters, Stabenow, Casey, and Kildee introducing the Veterans Exposed to Toxic PFAS (VET PFAS) Act to guarantee VA health care for veterans and families exposed to PFAS — matching the promise date and text verbatim. (2) GovInfo BILLS-118s2294is confirms S.2294 (118th Congress), the VET PFAS Act, introduced July 13, 2023, Sponsor Stabenow, with Gary C. Peters as a named cosponsor — establishing the "keep working" element via reintroduction in a later Congress. (3) The congress.gov S.1023 URL returned HTTP 403 under WebFetch, but its cited claim is independently corroborated by the GPO/GovInfo primary record (BILLS-116s1023is) and the congress.gov bill text: S.1023 (116th Congress), VET PFAS Act, introduced April 3, 2019 by "Ms. Stabenow (for herself, Mr. Peters, and Mr. Casey)," read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs, with Peters an original cosponsor. The promise was framed as introducing the bill and continuing to work the PFAS issue, not as securing enactment; two verified introductions across separate Congresses (116th and 118th) plus his PFAS Task Force role demonstrate sustained advocacy consistent with CHAMPIONED rather than a one-time FULL. Non-enactment does not count against the promise. Confidence is tempered because Stabenow is the formal lead sponsor and Peters a consistent co-lead/original cosponsor, so the leadership is shared. Applying the same bar to either party, the outcome is not overstated by the evidence.
Your opinion on this assessment(clearly labeled opinion)
Sign in to vote.
Discussion
community opinionsComments are user opinions — not verdicts. They do not affect the official assessment.
Sign in to join the discussion.
Propose a correction
community accountabilitySee an error in the promise text, status, significance, or missing source? Submit a sourced correction — a reviewer will evaluate and apply it if accurate. Your submission must cite evidence; unsourced changes are not accepted.
Sign in or create an account to propose a correction.
Debate
sourced community argumentsThese are sourced community arguments — not StumpWatch assessments. Each cites a source and is community-contributed; it does not change the official status or rating above.
No arguments yet
Be the first to weigh in. Every argument cites a source and is reviewed before it publishes. Create an account to add one and help keep this promise honest.
Add a sourced argument
Cite a source for your point. Submissions are held for reviewer approval before they appear.
Sign in or create an account to add an argument.