Skip to main content

Politicians make promises on their stump — we watch and hold them accountable.

Help keep the record honest →Create an account
ChampionedPrescription Drug Costs

Committed to keep working to lower health care and prescription drug prices for Michigan families and seniors.

Sources (click to view full provenance)

Propose an edit to this promise's details

Suggest a sourced correction to the promise text, topic, scope, significance, or dates. Changing the promise text requires a source. Your suggestion is reviewed before it changes the record.

Sign in and complete the Contributor Agreement to propose an edit.

Assessments

evidence-backed verdicts

These are sourced verdicts from fact-checkers or community evidence reviews — not opinions.

ChampionedFact-checker reviewConfidence: 85%

Independent re-check confirms every cited source is real, live, and accurately quoted. This is an ongoing 'keep working' pledge, and Peters demonstrably led rather than merely voting: (1) He introduced Medicare Part B inflation-rebate provisions; the Senate Finance Committee approved provisions 'based on his legislation' (2019), and that mechanism was enacted in the Inflation Reduction Act (Part B inflation rebates began April 1, 2023, confirmed by CMS/ASPE). (2) He voted for the IRA on Aug 7, 2022 (51-50, all Democrats in favor), which lets Medicare negotiate drug prices, caps insulin at $35/month and out-of-pocket costs at $2,000 for Medicare beneficiaries. (3) He cosponsored the Medicare price-negotiation bill, the REMEDY Act, and the Affordable Prescriptions for Patients Act. (4) As HSGAC Ranking Member he opened an investigation into rising drug costs and released a report with recommendations. This is active leadership with real enactment on the promise's exact direction. FULL is not warranted because the pledge is an ongoing commitment, not a discrete 100%-completable task; CHAMPIONED is the fair label and would apply identically to a member of either party with this authored-provision-plus-enactment record.

Your opinion on this assessment(clearly labeled opinion)

Sign in to vote.

Discussion

community opinions

Comments are user opinions — not verdicts. They do not affect the official assessment.

Sign in to join the discussion.

Propose a correction

community accountability

See an error in the promise text, status, significance, or missing source? Submit a sourced correction — a reviewer will evaluate and apply it if accurate. Your submission must cite evidence; unsourced changes are not accepted.

Sign in or create an account to propose a correction.

Debate

sourced community arguments

These are sourced community arguments — not StumpWatch assessments. Each cites a source and is community-contributed; it does not change the official status or rating above.

No arguments yet

Be the first to weigh in. Every argument cites a source and is reviewed before it publishes. Create an account to add one and help keep this promise honest.

Add a sourced argument

Cite a source for your point. Submissions are held for reviewer approval before they appear.

Sign in or create an account to add an argument.

StumpWatch is live, and the record is still growing. Many promises and positions aren’t tracked yet, and some features are still in beta. Add a sourced promise and help keep the record honest.

Help keep the record honest →