Adversarial re-check. SOURCE AUDIT: all four prior sources were fetched and are real and live, and each actually contains the quoted language. The April 23, 2024 senate.gov statement does contain 'I will continue to push for a ceasefire and a return of all the hostages' (promise origin confirmed). The September 11, 2025 CODEL findings release does contain 'pressed for an immediate ceasefire and the return of all hostages.' The September 18, 2025 statehood-resolution release does contain 'First, an immediate ceasefire, return of all hostages, and influx of aid.' The NBC16/Sinclair article is live and reports the August 2025 trip. No invented or broken sources. Independent (non-self-published) corroboration also exists: Capital News Service (Univ. of Maryland) covered the September 11, 2025 report, quoting Van Hollen: 'This is the time to use that influence to end the war and bring the hostages home.' CONTINUITY CHECK: I independently walked Van Hollen's press-release archive by month rather than relying on the prior rater's narrative, and the record of sustained engagement after April 2024 holds: Nov 18, 2024 statement supporting the Joint Resolutions of Disapproval on offensive weapons transfers; Jan 15, 2025 statement on the hostage-release/ceasefire agreement; Aug 2025 CODEL to the Gaza border, Israel, West Bank, Jordan and Egypt; Sept 11, 2025 joint findings report; Sept 18, 2025 co-introduced statehood resolution; Oct 9, 2025 statement on the ceasefire deal. No gap or lapse found, and no contrary vote or action pointing away from the promise's direction. CORRECTION TO PRIOR RATING (1): the prior rationale asserted Van Hollen 'led congressional delegations ... (January 2025 and August 2025).' I could not verify any January 2025 delegation; the January 2025 item in the archive is a written statement on the ceasefire agreement, not a CODEL. That claim is dropped. CORRECTION TO PRIOR RATING (2) - outcome: downgrading FULL to CHAMPIONED. FULL (+1.0) should be reserved for a concrete promised deliverable that was actually delivered. This is an open-ended advocacy commitment, and the verified record is precisely what the CHAMPIONED definition describes - he actively LED and drove the effort well beyond a single supporting vote (led the delegation, authored the findings report, co-introduced the resolution) without the objective landing through his own action. Applying the same standard to the other party: a senator who promised to 'keep pushing' for a border bill, then led a fact-finding trip, published a report and co-introduced a bill that never passed, would be rated CHAMPIONED, not FULL; awarding the maximum score for sustained advocacy alone would be leniency. Van Hollen's own Oct 9, 2025 statement concedes the breakthrough came from external pressure ('Pressure from the U.S. and others has always been necessary to reach this moment'), confirming the outcome was not his to deliver. CHAMPIONED at +0.75 is the fair, symmetric label; confidence 0.85 given that every underlying source is verified primary material with independent press corroboration.