“Vowed to maintain his hold on a Treasury Department nominee and block other Treasury nominations until the administration provides financial documents related to Russia.”
Sources (click to view full provenance)
Propose an edit to this promise's details
Suggest a sourced correction to the promise text, topic, scope, significance, or dates. Changing the promise text requires a source. Your suggestion is reviewed before it changes the record.
Sign in and complete the Contributor Agreement to propose an edit.
Assessments
evidence-backed verdictsThese are sourced verdicts from fact-checkers or community evidence reviews — not opinions.
All four cited sources are reachable and support the rated outcome; no quote is fabricated. (1) The PRIMARY Senate Finance release (June 4, 2018) contains the promise-defining quote verbatim — Wyden vows to "maintain my hold on Ms. Patelunas, and to block other nominations until this stonewalling ends" — over Treasury documents "related to follow-the-money issues and Russia" and Michael Cohen transactions. (2) Roll Call confirms he extended the blockade by placing a hold on a second Treasury nominee, Justin Muzinich, explicitly over Russia-linked documents (Cohen, Torshin, Butina); the cited quote appears as the opening of a longer verified sentence. (3) The Washington Examiner verifies the load-bearing phrase "until the department quits stonewalling our oversight requests" tied to Wyden's Muzinich hold; the rating's ellipsis rendering is a fair composite. (4) Wikipedia confirms the eventual 55-44 confirmation and Dec 12, 2018 assumption of office, the sole fact it is cited for. Because this is an action promise about Wyden's own conduct — which he fulfilled and personally led beyond a mere vote — and the leverage ultimately failed only via a majority cloture override outside his unilateral control (documents never produced), CHAMPIONED does not overstate the evidence and is more defensible than FULL. Rating upheld.
Your opinion on this assessment(clearly labeled opinion)
Sign in to vote.
Discussion
community opinionsComments are user opinions — not verdicts. They do not affect the official assessment.
Sign in to join the discussion.
Propose a correction
community accountabilitySee an error in the promise text, status, significance, or missing source? Submit a sourced correction — a reviewer will evaluate and apply it if accurate. Your submission must cite evidence; unsourced changes are not accepted.
Sign in or create an account to propose a correction.
Debate
sourced community argumentsThese are sourced community arguments — not StumpWatch assessments. Each cites a source and is community-contributed; it does not change the official status or rating above.
No arguments yet
Be the first to weigh in. Every argument cites a source and is reviewed before it publishes. Create an account to add one and help keep this promise honest.
Add a sourced argument
Cite a source for your point. Submissions are held for reviewer approval before they appear.
Sign in or create an account to add an argument.