“Committed to passing his Conservation and Innovative Climate Partnership Act to give farmers access to the latest tools and research for adopting conservation practices while keeping farmland productive.”
Sources (click to view full provenance)
Propose an edit to this promise's details
Suggest a sourced correction to the promise text, topic, scope, significance, or dates. Changing the promise text requires a source. Your suggestion is reviewed before it changes the record.
Sign in and complete the Contributor Agreement to propose an edit.
Assessments
evidence-backed verdictsThese are sourced verdicts from fact-checkers or community evidence reviews — not opinions.
The ATTEMPTED rating is well-supported. Two of the three cited sources are reachable and verify cleanly: (1) the Young Senate press release (PRIMARY, dated March 22, 2023) confirms Young as lead sponsor with cosponsors Smith, Braun, and Schatz, and the quoted statement is VERBATIM accurate ("My Conservation and Innovative Climate Partnership Act gives farmers access to the latest tools and research in order to be successful while keeping American soil productive and healthy"); (2) BillTrack50 (REPUTABLE_SECONDARY) confirms S.900 is "Dead" as of 01/03/2025, its last action was "Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry" on 03/21/2023, and it never passed or became law. The third source, Congress.gov, returned HTTP 403 — this is Congress.gov's standard automated-fetch block, not a fabricated or broken URL (it is the genuine canonical bill page, confirmed in search results), and every fact attributed to it (S.900 introduced 03/21/2023 by Young, referred to the Agriculture Committee) is independently corroborated by the verified BillTrack50 record and by web search. The evidence shows Young genuinely authored and led his own bill (lead sponsor, bipartisan cosponsors, companion House bill H.R.2719) but the promise was to PASS it, and it died in committee with no markup, floor vote, or enactment. ATTEMPTED is correct and appropriately conservative: not FULL/CHAMPIONED because nothing passed, not PARTIAL because no portion was enacted, and it does not overstate the evidence.
Your opinion on this assessment(clearly labeled opinion)
Sign in to vote.
Discussion
community opinionsComments are user opinions — not verdicts. They do not affect the official assessment.
Sign in to join the discussion.
Propose a correction
community accountabilitySee an error in the promise text, status, significance, or missing source? Submit a sourced correction — a reviewer will evaluate and apply it if accurate. Your submission must cite evidence; unsourced changes are not accepted.
Sign in or create an account to propose a correction.
Debate
sourced community argumentsThese are sourced community arguments — not StumpWatch assessments. Each cites a source and is community-contributed; it does not change the official status or rating above.
No arguments yet
Be the first to weigh in. Every argument cites a source and is reviewed before it publishes. Create an account to add one and help keep this promise honest.
Add a sourced argument
Cite a source for your point. Submissions are held for reviewer approval before they appear.
Sign in or create an account to add an argument.