“Enact the Save Our Future Act to place a fee on carbon dioxide and other air pollutants and return the revenue to families and affected communities, including direct checks to Americans in need.”
Sources (click to view full provenance)
Propose an edit to this promise's details
Suggest a sourced correction to the promise text, topic, scope, significance, or dates. Changing the promise text requires a source. Your suggestion is reviewed before it changes the record.
Sign in and complete the Contributor Agreement to propose an edit.
Assessments
evidence-backed verdictsThese are sourced verdicts from fact-checkers or community evidence reviews — not opinions.
The ATTEMPTED rating is well-supported and not overstated. The promise was to ENACT the Save Our Future Act — a carbon-fee bill returning revenue to families via direct checks. Two independently reachable sources confirm both halves of the outcome: (1) Schatz took the concrete legislative action within his power, and (2) the bill was never enacted, dying in committee. The PRIMARY Whitehouse Senate press release (reachable) confirms verbatim that "Senators Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI) and Brian Schatz (D-HI) are introducing legislation to drastically drive down the harmful emissions causing climate change," that it assesses fees on large emitters, and that it returns revenue as direct checks ($800/eligible adult and $300/eligible dependent per year) — matching the promise's mechanism precisely. BillTrack50 (reachable) confirms the bill is marked "Dead" as of 01/03/2023, with the last action "Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance" on 06/16/2021, and that it never advanced beyond its committee referral. Because Schatz actually acted (co-introduced) but the measure failed within the normal legislative process without enactment, ATTEMPTED is the correct tier — not a KEPT-tier outcome (no enactment) and not NO_OPPORTUNITY (he did have and use a chance to act). The Congress.gov citation returned HTTP 403 (a bot-block, not a content mismatch), but the one fact it supports — referral to the Committee on Finance — is independently corroborated by BillTrack50, so the rating does not depend on the unreachable source.
Your opinion on this assessment(clearly labeled opinion)
Sign in to vote.
Discussion
community opinionsComments are user opinions — not verdicts. They do not affect the official assessment.
Sign in to join the discussion.
Propose a correction
community accountabilitySee an error in the promise text, status, significance, or missing source? Submit a sourced correction — a reviewer will evaluate and apply it if accurate. Your submission must cite evidence; unsourced changes are not accepted.
Sign in or create an account to propose a correction.
Debate
sourced community argumentsThese are sourced community arguments — not StumpWatch assessments. Each cites a source and is community-contributed; it does not change the official status or rating above.
No arguments yet
Be the first to weigh in. Every argument cites a source and is reviewed before it publishes. Create an account to add one and help keep this promise honest.
Add a sourced argument
Cite a source for your point. Submissions are held for reviewer approval before they appear.
Sign in or create an account to add an argument.