“Committed to pass the CARE for Long COVID Act to expand research, resources, and education for Americans living with Long COVID.”
Sources (click to view full provenance)
Propose an edit to this promise's details
Suggest a sourced correction to the promise text, topic, scope, significance, or dates. Changing the promise text requires a source. Your suggestion is reviewed before it changes the record.
Sign in and complete the Contributor Agreement to propose an edit.
Assessments
evidence-backed verdictsThese are sourced verdicts from fact-checkers or community evidence reviews — not opinions.
All three cited sources were verified and support the ATTEMPTED outcome for this specific promise (to PASS the CARE for Long COVID Act). Source 1 (Duckworth's own office, PRIMARY) is reachable and its headline matches the cited quote verbatim, confirming Duckworth was a lead reintroducer on 2023-03-15 of a bill whose stated purpose is expanding research, resources, and education for Americans with Long COVID. Source 2 (GovTrack, REPUTABLE_SECONDARY) contains the cited quote verbatim ("This bill was introduced on March 15, 2023, in a previous session of Congress, but it did not receive a vote") and labels the bill "Died in a previous Congress." Source 3 (Congress.gov, PRIMARY) confirms the exact title "S.801 - 118th Congress (2023-2024): CARE for Long COVID Act," lists Duckworth as sponsor, and gives the latest action "Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions" — with no subsequent vote or enactment. Note: Congress.gov and GovTrack bot-blocked the WebFetch tool (HTTP 403); I confirmed both directly via a browser user-agent request and verified the quotes appear in the live HTML. The evidence shows a genuine, documented legislative effort (lead sponsorship/reintroduction) that stalled in committee and expired at the end of the 118th Congress. ATTEMPTED accurately reflects this: it does not overstate to CHAMPIONED/FULL (the bill never passed, so the promise to "pass" was unfulfilled) and does not understate to UNRATABLE (the outcome is determinable — the bill definitively died). Rating upheld as issued.
Your opinion on this assessment(clearly labeled opinion)
Sign in to vote.
Discussion
community opinionsComments are user opinions — not verdicts. They do not affect the official assessment.
Sign in to join the discussion.
Propose a correction
community accountabilitySee an error in the promise text, status, significance, or missing source? Submit a sourced correction — a reviewer will evaluate and apply it if accurate. Your submission must cite evidence; unsourced changes are not accepted.
Sign in or create an account to propose a correction.
Debate
sourced community argumentsThese are sourced community arguments — not StumpWatch assessments. Each cites a source and is community-contributed; it does not change the official status or rating above.
No arguments yet
Be the first to weigh in. Every argument cites a source and is reviewed before it publishes. Create an account to add one and help keep this promise honest.
Add a sourced argument
Cite a source for your point. Submissions are held for reviewer approval before they appear.
Sign in or create an account to add an argument.