“Cramer committed to act to defund sanctuary cities.”
Sources (click to view full provenance)
Propose an edit to this promise's details
Suggest a sourced correction to the promise text, topic, scope, significance, or dates. Changing the promise text requires a source. Your suggestion is reviewed before it changes the record.
Sign in and complete the Contributor Agreement to propose an edit.
Assessments
evidence-backed verdictsThese are sourced verdicts from fact-checkers or community evidence reviews — not opinions.
Both cited sources support the PARTIAL outcome and their quotes are accurate. Source 1 (Cramer's own press release) was fetched directly and confirms verbatim that "U.S. Senator Kevin Cramer (R-ND) cosponsored Senator Ted Cruz's (R-TX) Stop Dangerous Sanctuary Cities Act," legislation that restricts sanctuary cities' eligibility for federal grants — Cramer is a cosponsor, not the lead author (Cruz leads). Source 2 (congress.gov S.685) returns HTTP 403 to automated fetch (a bot block, not a dead/fabricated link); I independently confirmed via web search that S.685, 119th Congress, is a live primary record listing Cramer among the cosponsors, that it pulls federal grants from sanctuary cities, and that its status is exactly "Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary." Thus Cramer performed the committed act (repeated cosponsorship of bills to defund sanctuary jurisdictions), but the substantive objective — actually defunding them — was never enacted: the bills stalled after referral to the Judiciary Committee with no floor vote or passage. That is genuine partial fulfillment: pledged personal action taken, downstream result stalled. CHAMPIONED is correctly rejected because he is only a cosponsor (no leadership/authorship). FULL is inappropriate because sanctuary cities remain funded. PARTIAL neither overstates nor understates the record.
Your opinion on this assessment(clearly labeled opinion)
Sign in to vote.
Discussion
community opinionsComments are user opinions — not verdicts. They do not affect the official assessment.
Sign in to join the discussion.
Propose a correction
community accountabilitySee an error in the promise text, status, significance, or missing source? Submit a sourced correction — a reviewer will evaluate and apply it if accurate. Your submission must cite evidence; unsourced changes are not accepted.
Sign in or create an account to propose a correction.
Debate
sourced community argumentsThese are sourced community arguments — not StumpWatch assessments. Each cites a source and is community-contributed; it does not change the official status or rating above.
No arguments yet
Be the first to weigh in. Every argument cites a source and is reviewed before it publishes. Create an account to add one and help keep this promise honest.
Add a sourced argument
Cite a source for your point. Submissions are held for reviewer approval before they appear.
Sign in or create an account to add an argument.