“Cramer committed to passing the PEACE Act to prohibit federal education funding from being used to promote Critical Race Theory and 'divisive concepts.'”
Sources (click to view full provenance)
Propose an edit to this promise's details
Suggest a sourced correction to the promise text, topic, scope, significance, or dates. Changing the promise text requires a source. Your suggestion is reviewed before it changes the record.
Sign in and complete the Contributor Agreement to propose an edit.
Assessments
evidence-backed verdictsThese are sourced verdicts from fact-checkers or community evidence reviews — not opinions.
Verified as ATTEMPTED. The Cramer Senate press release (PRIMARY) fetched successfully and confirms the promise's substance verbatim: dated July 26, 2023, describing the PEACE Act (Protect Equality and Civics Education Act) to bar federal funds from promoting divisive concepts / Critical Race Theory under the Education Department's American History and Civics Education program, with the cited Cramer quote present word-for-word. Cramer co-introduced/cosponsored the 2023 bill (S.2468, 118th Congress; Rubio lead sponsor), independently corroborated by the Rubio primary press release. That bill died without ever receiving a committee or floor vote — GovTrack's page text (surfaced via web search since GovTrack 403-blocks automated fetches) states it was "introduced on July 25, 2023 ... but it did not receive a vote." The reintroduced PEACE Act of 2025 (S.227, 119th Congress) was read twice and referred to the Senate HELP committee on Jan 23, 2025 — GovTrack's "first stage of the legislative process" — and has not passed. This fits ATTEMPTED: Cramer took the available legislative action (co-sponsorship of a bill he committed to passing) but the bill never passed and never even got a vote, so no part of the "passing" goal was achieved (not PARTIAL/FULL). He was a cosponsor, not the lead author, so not CHAMPIONED — the rating correctly declined leadership. Not UNRATABLE: the outcome is definitively determined (bill died without a vote) and the reintroduced version remains stalled in committee. One caveat: the rationale's claim that Cramer also cosponsored S.227 is unconfirmed by available sources (the 2025 version's sponsor is Risch, cosponsors Crapo/Sheehy/Lummis, with no confirmation Cramer joined), but this detail is not load-bearing — the ATTEMPTED outcome rests on the definitively-failed 118th Congress bill Cramer demonstrably co-introduced.
Your opinion on this assessment(clearly labeled opinion)
Sign in to vote.
Discussion
community opinionsComments are user opinions — not verdicts. They do not affect the official assessment.
Sign in to join the discussion.
Propose a correction
community accountabilitySee an error in the promise text, status, significance, or missing source? Submit a sourced correction — a reviewer will evaluate and apply it if accurate. Your submission must cite evidence; unsourced changes are not accepted.
Sign in or create an account to propose a correction.
Debate
sourced community argumentsThese are sourced community arguments — not StumpWatch assessments. Each cites a source and is community-contributed; it does not change the official status or rating above.
No arguments yet
Be the first to weigh in. Every argument cites a source and is reviewed before it publishes. Create an account to add one and help keep this promise honest.
Add a sourced argument
Cite a source for your point. Submissions are held for reviewer approval before they appear.
Sign in or create an account to add an argument.