“States he remains committed to protecting the Affordable Care Act, Medicare, and Medicaid.”
Sources (click to view full provenance)
Propose an edit to this promise's details
Suggest a sourced correction to the promise text, topic, scope, significance, or dates. Changing the promise text requires a source. Your suggestion is reviewed before it changes the record.
Sign in and complete the Contributor Agreement to propose an edit.
Assessments
evidence-backed verdictsThese are sourced verdicts from fact-checkers or community evidence reviews — not opinions.
All four cited sources are reachable and every quoted phrase appears verbatim. (1) Senate roll call vote 179 confirms Kaine voted Nay on McConnell Amdt. 667 (H.R. 1628), rejected 49-51 — the July 28, 2017 "skinny repeal" defeat that preserved the ACA. (2) The July 30, 2025 Warner/Kaine press release confirms Kaine co-introduced legislation to repeal the GOP "Big, Ugly Bill" health provisions and permanently extend the ACA's enhanced tax credits — genuine bill authorship/sponsorship (though co-led with Warner, who is named first). (3) The 2017 budget-vote statement confirms Kaine voted against the fast-track repeal resolution with both quoted phrases intact. (4) His issues page contains the promise verbatim. The CHAMPIONED bar (sponsored/authored/led) is satisfied by source 2 — Kaine is a named co-introducer of defensive legislation, which is leadership beyond a mere floor vote. Confidence is held below the original 0.82 because two rationale claims (co-reintroducing the Medicare-X Choice Act; filing budget-resolution amendments) are NOT documented in any cited source, and the strongest leadership evidence is co-led rather than singularly Kaine-driven. Nothing contradicts the promise; the record is fully aligned.
Your opinion on this assessment(clearly labeled opinion)
Sign in to vote.
Discussion
community opinionsComments are user opinions — not verdicts. They do not affect the official assessment.
Sign in to join the discussion.
Propose a correction
community accountabilitySee an error in the promise text, status, significance, or missing source? Submit a sourced correction — a reviewer will evaluate and apply it if accurate. Your submission must cite evidence; unsourced changes are not accepted.
Sign in or create an account to propose a correction.
Debate
sourced community argumentsThese are sourced community arguments — not StumpWatch assessments. Each cites a source and is community-contributed; it does not change the official status or rating above.
No arguments yet
Be the first to weigh in. Every argument cites a source and is reviewed before it publishes. Create an account to add one and help keep this promise honest.
Add a sourced argument
Cite a source for your point. Submissions are held for reviewer approval before they appear.
Sign in or create an account to add an argument.