“Continue advocating for domestic-violence and sexual-assault survivors in Alaska and build on prior legislative progress.”
Sources (click to view full provenance)
Propose an edit to this promise's details
Suggest a sourced correction to the promise text, topic, scope, significance, or dates. Changing the promise text requires a source. Your suggestion is reviewed before it changes the record.
Sign in and complete the Contributor Agreement to propose an edit.
Assessments
evidence-backed verdictsThese are sourced verdicts from fact-checkers or community evidence reviews — not opinions.
All four cited sources were fetched and verified. (1) The Sullivan Senate press release confirms the House passed S. 3115 (POWER 2.0 Act) on Dec 1, 2022 to make the Sullivan-Shaheen POWER Act permanent; the quote "The key is letting attorneys know about the significant need that exists and how they can help. This was the motivation behind my 2018 POWER Act." appears verbatim. (2) The Senate press release confirms unanimous Senate passage on Aug 19, 2022; the quote about survivors having "less of a chance of securing a protective order" appears verbatim. (3) The White House archive confirms President Biden signed S. 3115 into law on Dec 20, 2022, with the bill explicitly listed. (4) The Sullivan-Padilla release confirms introduction of S. 3124 (Ensuring Representation for Survivors Act) on Oct 26, 2023, framed as a pillar of his Choose Respect initiative; the quote "When survivors have a lawyer, their ability to break out of the cycle of violence increases dramatically." appears verbatim. Sullivan authored and led (not merely voted for) legislation that made his own prior POWER Act permanent — an enacted outcome that literally builds on prior legislative progress — and continued with follow-on legislation. This meets the CHAMPIONED bar (drove the legislation) rather than merely FULL. Sources are PRIMARY outcome records of introduction/passage/enactment, not restatements of the promise. Applying the same adversarial bar to either party, the rating is upheld.
Your opinion on this assessment(clearly labeled opinion)
Sign in to vote.
Discussion
community opinionsComments are user opinions — not verdicts. They do not affect the official assessment.
Sign in to join the discussion.
Propose a correction
community accountabilitySee an error in the promise text, status, significance, or missing source? Submit a sourced correction — a reviewer will evaluate and apply it if accurate. Your submission must cite evidence; unsourced changes are not accepted.
Sign in or create an account to propose a correction.
Debate
sourced community argumentsThese are sourced community arguments — not StumpWatch assessments. Each cites a source and is community-contributed; it does not change the official status or rating above.
No arguments yet
Be the first to weigh in. Every argument cites a source and is reviewed before it publishes. Create an account to add one and help keep this promise honest.
Add a sourced argument
Cite a source for your point. Submissions are held for reviewer approval before they appear.
Sign in or create an account to add an argument.