Skip to main content

Politicians make promises on their stump — we watch and hold them accountable.

Help keep the record honest →Create an account
Fully KeptGovernment Oversight

Commitment to personally issue a "Squeal Award" every month that identifies a specific federal expense, program, or concept she deems wasteful and says must be cut.

Sources (click to view full provenance)

Propose an edit to this promise's details

Suggest a sourced correction to the promise text, topic, scope, significance, or dates. Changing the promise text requires a source. Your suggestion is reviewed before it changes the record.

Sign in and complete the Contributor Agreement to propose an edit.

Assessments

evidence-backed verdicts

These are sourced verdicts from fact-checkers or community evidence reviews — not opinions.

Fully KeptFact-checker reviewConfidence: 90%

All three cited sources were fetched and verified. (1) Ernst's official Senate "Make 'Em Squeal News" feed is reachable and contains the exact quote "November 2025 Squeal Award - Fast Food Stamps"; it also shows a consistent monthly cadence of dated Squeal Awards (Nov 2025, Dec 2025, Jan 2026, Feb 2026, March 2026, April 2026, May 2026 — seven consecutive months), each naming a specific federal expense/program/concept she deems wasteful and says must be cut. (2) The official make-em-squeal page contains the exact quote "I will be giving out my Squeal Award each month, which recognizes a Washington expense, program or concept that has proven to be wasteful and must be cut," documenting the monthly commitment in her own words. (3) Iowa Starting Line (opposition-leaning secondary) is reachable and contains the exact quote "Ernst's press team sends monthly updates on the latest 'squeal award' recipient," independently corroborating the ongoing monthly practice. She did what she promised — personally identify a specific wasteful item each month and call for its cut — so FULL is supported. Not CHAMPIONED: this is her own recurring accountability practice, not sponsored/authored/led legislation, so the higher bar does not apply. Confidence held at 0.9 rather than higher because the directly verified official record covers a recent multi-month window with slightly uneven posting dates, so a literally unbroken every-single-month streak across the full decade is corroborated only by the secondary source, not exhaustively confirmed from the primary record.

Your opinion on this assessment(clearly labeled opinion)

Sign in to vote.

Discussion

community opinions

Comments are user opinions — not verdicts. They do not affect the official assessment.

Sign in to join the discussion.

Propose a correction

community accountability

See an error in the promise text, status, significance, or missing source? Submit a sourced correction — a reviewer will evaluate and apply it if accurate. Your submission must cite evidence; unsourced changes are not accepted.

Sign in or create an account to propose a correction.

Debate

sourced community arguments

These are sourced community arguments — not StumpWatch assessments. Each cites a source and is community-contributed; it does not change the official status or rating above.

No arguments yet

Be the first to weigh in. Every argument cites a source and is reviewed before it publishes. Create an account to add one and help keep this promise honest.

Add a sourced argument

Cite a source for your point. Submissions are held for reviewer approval before they appear.

Sign in or create an account to add an argument.

StumpWatch is live, and the record is still growing. Many promises and positions aren’t tracked yet, and some features are still in beta. Add a sourced promise and help keep the record honest.

Help keep the record honest →