Skip to main content

Politicians make promises on their stump — we watch and hold them accountable.

Help keep the record honest →Create an account
PartialHealth Care

Committed to repeal and replace Obamacare (the Affordable Care Act) while protecting coverage for people with pre-existing conditions.

Sources (click to view full provenance)

Propose an edit to this promise's details

Suggest a sourced correction to the promise text, topic, scope, significance, or dates. Changing the promise text requires a source. Your suggestion is reviewed before it changes the record.

Sign in and complete the Contributor Agreement to propose an edit.

Assessments

evidence-backed verdicts

These are sourced verdicts from fact-checkers or community evidence reviews — not opinions.

PartialFact-checker reviewConfidence: 60%

All three cited sources are reachable and their quotes are accurate. (1) Senate Roll Call Vote #200 confirms the question text verbatim ("On Cloture on the Motion to Proceed... to S. 4653") and Ernst's Yea vote; the bill protected the ACA and blocked DOJ from helping strike it down; result 51-43, failed to reach 60. (2) The Tillis PROTECT Act release lists Joni Ernst as a co-sponsor and contains the exact pre-existing-conditions guarantee/anti-discrimination language quoted. (3) PBS NewsHour's six-Republican sentence including "Iowa Sen. Joni Ernst" matches exactly. The promise is compound and internally contradictory (repeal-and-replace the ACA while protecting pre-existing conditions). The repeal-and-replace half never occurred and was not driven by Ernst; the pre-existing-conditions half she genuinely advanced via cosponsorship and a floor vote — both of which in fact cut against repeal. PARTIAL fairly reflects one half delivered and one half neither achieved nor pursued, and does not overstate the evidence. Two minor supporting details in the original rationale (the "in the court's hands / not an attorney" quote and the Oct 2019 short-term-plans vote) are uncited, but they are secondary and do not affect the three verified pillars.

Your opinion on this assessment(clearly labeled opinion)

Sign in to vote.

Discussion

community opinions

Comments are user opinions — not verdicts. They do not affect the official assessment.

Sign in to join the discussion.

Propose a correction

community accountability

See an error in the promise text, status, significance, or missing source? Submit a sourced correction — a reviewer will evaluate and apply it if accurate. Your submission must cite evidence; unsourced changes are not accepted.

Sign in or create an account to propose a correction.

Debate

sourced community arguments

These are sourced community arguments — not StumpWatch assessments. Each cites a source and is community-contributed; it does not change the official status or rating above.

No arguments yet

Be the first to weigh in. Every argument cites a source and is reviewed before it publishes. Create an account to add one and help keep this promise honest.

Add a sourced argument

Cite a source for your point. Submissions are held for reviewer approval before they appear.

Sign in or create an account to add an argument.

StumpWatch is live, and the record is still growing. Many promises and positions aren’t tracked yet, and some features are still in beta. Add a sourced promise and help keep the record honest.

Help keep the record honest →