“Committed to replacing Obamacare with an alternative health care system.”
Sources (click to view full provenance)
Propose an edit to this promise's details
Suggest a sourced correction to the promise text, topic, scope, significance, or dates. Changing the promise text requires a source. Your suggestion is reviewed before it changes the record.
Sign in and complete the Contributor Agreement to propose an edit.
Assessments
evidence-backed verdictsThese are sourced verdicts from fact-checkers or community evidence reviews — not opinions.
Kennedy (R-LA) promised to replace Obamacare with an alternative system. The two PRIMARY Senate roll-call sources verify exactly: on Roll Call 115-1-169 (S.Amdt. 271 to H.R. 1628, the Obamacare Repeal Reconciliation Act amendment, July 26, 2017, rejected 45-55) the record shows "Kennedy (R-LA), Yea"; on Roll Call 115-1-179 (S.Amdt. 667 to H.R. 1628, the "skinny repeal"/Health Care Freedom Act, July 28, 2017, rejected 49-51) the record shows "Kennedy (R-LA), Yea". The CNBC secondary source is a live article whose headline ("Senate blocks 'skinny' Obamacare repeal bill in dramatic late-night vote") is confirmed verbatim and which documents the 49-51 failure after the McCain/Collins/Murkowski defections (direct WebFetch returned a 403 bot-block, but the article is reachable and its content confirmed via CNBC-domain search). Outcome is ATTEMPTED: Kennedy consistently voted FOR his stated goal but no alternative system was enacted and the ACA remains law, the effort dying through ordinary legislative process. Not FULL/PARTIAL (nothing replacing the ACA passed). Not CHAMPIONED (he was a supporting vote, not author/sponsor/floor-leader of the replacement bills). Not MISALIGNED/HOSTILE (his votes aligned with the promise). The rationale's uncited "keep my promise" quotation is narrative color and not part of the verified source set, so it does not affect the rating.
Your opinion on this assessment(clearly labeled opinion)
Sign in to vote.
Discussion
community opinionsComments are user opinions — not verdicts. They do not affect the official assessment.
Sign in to join the discussion.
Propose a correction
community accountabilitySee an error in the promise text, status, significance, or missing source? Submit a sourced correction — a reviewer will evaluate and apply it if accurate. Your submission must cite evidence; unsourced changes are not accepted.
Sign in or create an account to propose a correction.
Debate
sourced community argumentsThese are sourced community arguments — not StumpWatch assessments. Each cites a source and is community-contributed; it does not change the official status or rating above.
No arguments yet
Be the first to weigh in. Every argument cites a source and is reviewed before it publishes. Create an account to add one and help keep this promise honest.
Add a sourced argument
Cite a source for your point. Submissions are held for reviewer approval before they appear.
Sign in or create an account to add an argument.