“Committed to keep working to expand reproductive rights following the Supreme Court's decision overturning Roe v. Wade.”
Sources (click to view full provenance)
Propose an edit to this promise's details
Suggest a sourced correction to the promise text, topic, scope, significance, or dates. Changing the promise text requires a source. Your suggestion is reviewed before it changes the record.
Sign in and complete the Contributor Agreement to propose an edit.
Assessments
evidence-backed verdictsThese are sourced verdicts from fact-checkers or community evidence reviews — not opinions.
Verified all three cited sources by WebFetch. (1) CBS News: the vote-count quote is verbatim ("48 votes in favor to 47 opposed, with just two Republicans — Sens. Susan Collins of Maine and Lisa Murkowski of Alaska — joining Democrats and independents"); however this article does NOT name Hassan (it names Duckworth, Murray, Booker as sponsors), so it corroborates that the June 2024 IVF cloture vote occurred but does not itself document Hassan's participation. (2) Shaheen.senate.gov (PRIMARY): the core quoted phrase is verbatim and the release directly documents Hassan co-reintroducing the Women's Health Protection Act on the Dobbs anniversary — a concrete instance of continued effort after the promise date. (3) Hassan.senate.gov (PRIMARY): the floor-speech quote is verbatim (legitimate ellipsis) and dated Jan 22, 2025, documenting sustained floor advocacy against abortion restrictions. The promise was a continued-effort commitment to "keep working to expand reproductive rights" after Dobbs; two primary sources directly show Hassan doing exactly that (reintroducing WHPA, floor advocacy), establishing a sustained, consistent pattern that supports FULL. It is correctly FULL rather than CHAMPIONED — Hassan acts as co-sponsor/co-reintroducer and reliable yes-vote, not the lead author (WHPA's Senate lead is Blumenthal/Baldwin; IVF/Contraception primary sponsors were Duckworth/Markey et al.). The bills' failure to become law stems from Republican filibusters, not Hassan's inaction, and the promise concerned continued effort rather than enactment. Source 1's non-mention of Hassan is a minor weakness that does not invalidate the outcome, which is carried by the two primary sources.
Your opinion on this assessment(clearly labeled opinion)
Sign in to vote.
Discussion
community opinionsComments are user opinions — not verdicts. They do not affect the official assessment.
Sign in to join the discussion.
Propose a correction
community accountabilitySee an error in the promise text, status, significance, or missing source? Submit a sourced correction — a reviewer will evaluate and apply it if accurate. Your submission must cite evidence; unsourced changes are not accepted.
Sign in or create an account to propose a correction.
Debate
sourced community argumentsThese are sourced community arguments — not StumpWatch assessments. Each cites a source and is community-contributed; it does not change the official status or rating above.
No arguments yet
Be the first to weigh in. Every argument cites a source and is reviewed before it publishes. Create an account to add one and help keep this promise honest.
Add a sourced argument
Cite a source for your point. Submissions are held for reviewer approval before they appear.
Sign in or create an account to add an argument.