“Committed to fully fund special education by advancing the IDEA Full Funding Act so the federal government meets its funding commitment under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act.”
Sources (click to view full provenance)
Propose an edit to this promise's details
Suggest a sourced correction to the promise text, topic, scope, significance, or dates. Changing the promise text requires a source. Your suggestion is reviewed before it changes the record.
Sign in and complete the Contributor Agreement to propose an edit.
Assessments
evidence-backed verdictsThese are sourced verdicts from fact-checkers or community evidence reviews — not opinions.
All three cited sources were checked; two fetched directly and the third corroborated via web search after congress.gov returned HTTP 403 (bot-blocking, not a dead/fabricated link). (1) The Van Hollen press release (senate.gov) confirms the IDEA Full Funding Act (S.2217) was introduced July 10, 2023 by Van Hollen as lead sponsor and lists "Senators Maggie Hassan (D-N.H.), Tammy Baldwin (D-Wis.), Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.)..." as cosponsors — establishing Hassan is a cosponsor, NOT the author, so no leadership (correctly NOT CHAMPIONED). (2) The Hassan press release (senate.gov, April 22, 2025) confirms she is one of 30-plus cosponsors of the reintroduced bill and contains the cited quote verbatim: "IDEA funding makes a difference for families across New Hampshire by helping fund the support and resources that allow students with disabilities to succeed [academically and thrive]" — the rating's truncation is faithful. (3) The congress.gov S.2217 latest-action quote — "Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions" — and the fact the bill was not enacted were confirmed via web search of congress.gov's own listing; the quote is genuine. The promised OUTCOME (advancing the bill / fully funding special education) was not achieved: the bill stalled in committee, was never marked up or voted on, and the 40% federal IDEA commitment remains unmet (funding ~12%). Hassan did the part within her individual power (repeated cosponsorship plus public advocacy across two Congresses) but the collective outcome failed. PARTIAL is correct and appropriately conservative — it neither overstates (no CHAMPIONED, no FULL) nor understates the follow-through. No grounds for UNRATABLE: quotes are real, sources support the stated outcome, and the outcome does not exceed the evidence.
Your opinion on this assessment(clearly labeled opinion)
Sign in to vote.
Discussion
community opinionsComments are user opinions — not verdicts. They do not affect the official assessment.
Sign in to join the discussion.
Propose a correction
community accountabilitySee an error in the promise text, status, significance, or missing source? Submit a sourced correction — a reviewer will evaluate and apply it if accurate. Your submission must cite evidence; unsourced changes are not accepted.
Sign in or create an account to propose a correction.
Debate
sourced community argumentsThese are sourced community arguments — not StumpWatch assessments. Each cites a source and is community-contributed; it does not change the official status or rating above.
No arguments yet
Be the first to weigh in. Every argument cites a source and is reviewed before it publishes. Create an account to add one and help keep this promise honest.
Add a sourced argument
Cite a source for your point. Submissions are held for reviewer approval before they appear.
Sign in or create an account to add an argument.