“Committed to modernize outdated federal government IT systems through bipartisan legislation to strengthen cybersecurity and save taxpayer dollars.”
Sources (click to view full provenance)
Propose an edit to this promise's details
Suggest a sourced correction to the promise text, topic, scope, significance, or dates. Changing the promise text requires a source. Your suggestion is reviewed before it changes the record.
Sign in and complete the Contributor Agreement to propose an edit.
Assessments
evidence-backed verdictsThese are sourced verdicts from fact-checkers or community evidence reviews — not opinions.
Both cited sources are reachable and support the rating. The Hassan press release (PRIMARY) documents her introducing and leading the bipartisan Legacy IT Reduction Act of 2023 with Cornyn (R-TX) on June 15, 2023, mapping word-for-word to the promise (inventory/retire outdated federal IT, strengthen cybersecurity, save taxpayer dollars); the load-bearing quote is verified verbatim on the page: the bill would "help strengthen cybersecurity, improve taxpayers' experience using these systems, and ultimately save taxpayer dollars." The page also establishes real leadership (lead sponsor, subcommittee chair, prior DHS modernization hearing) rather than a mere vote. The Nextgov article (REPUTABLE_SECONDARY) confirms verbatim that "The 2022 version of the bill passed the Homeland Security and Government Affairs Committee but never received a vote in the full Senate." I independently verified via Congress.gov/GovTrack that S.2032 was introduced by Hassan ("for herself and Mr. Cornyn"), approved by HSGAC, but was never enacted before the 118th Congress ended on Jan 3, 2025, and unpassed legislation is cleared from the books, with no evidence its provisions rode another enacted vehicle. This is a genuine, sustained, leadership-level effort that failed to become law, so no modernization or savings were realized — ATTEMPTED is accurate and does not overstate the evidence (it is if anything the conservative read given her clear leadership). Confidence held slightly below full only for the ATTEMPTED/CHAMPIONED boundary and the small residual chance a provision was quietly enacted elsewhere.
Your opinion on this assessment(clearly labeled opinion)
Sign in to vote.
Discussion
community opinionsComments are user opinions — not verdicts. They do not affect the official assessment.
Sign in to join the discussion.
Propose a correction
community accountabilitySee an error in the promise text, status, significance, or missing source? Submit a sourced correction — a reviewer will evaluate and apply it if accurate. Your submission must cite evidence; unsourced changes are not accepted.
Sign in or create an account to propose a correction.
Debate
sourced community argumentsThese are sourced community arguments — not StumpWatch assessments. Each cites a source and is community-contributed; it does not change the official status or rating above.
No arguments yet
Be the first to weigh in. Every argument cites a source and is reviewed before it publishes. Create an account to add one and help keep this promise honest.
Add a sourced argument
Cite a source for your point. Submissions are held for reviewer approval before they appear.
Sign in or create an account to add an argument.