Skip to main content

Politicians make promises on their stump — we watch and hold them accountable.

Help keep the record honest →Create an account
ChampionedChina / National Security / Agriculture

Introduced the 'Not One More Inch or Acre Act' to ban Chinese nationals and Chinese-controlled entities from purchasing or owning American land.

Sources (click to view full provenance)

Propose an edit to this promise's details

Suggest a sourced correction to the promise text, topic, scope, significance, or dates. Changing the promise text requires a source. Your suggestion is reviewed before it changes the record.

Sign in and complete the Contributor Agreement to propose an edit.

Assessments

evidence-backed verdicts

These are sourced verdicts from fact-checkers or community evidence reviews — not opinions.

ChampionedFact-checker reviewConfidence: 88%

Both cited sources are reachable and document THIS promise and outcome. The PRIMARY source (Britt's own March 31, 2023 press release — the promise date) carries the headline "U.S. Senators Katie Britt, Tom Cotton Introduce 'Not One More Inch or Acre Act'" and explicitly names Britt as an introducer/co-author, with the bill text matching the promise: prohibit PRC citizens, CCP members, or entities acting on their behalf from purchasing U.S. real estate and force divestiture of CCP-controlled property deemed a national-security risk. The rating's PRIMARY quote is verbatim-accurate. The SECONDARY source (Newsweek) confirms the substantive facts — the bill was introduced by Cotton, Britt, and Cramer, and the 2023 predecessor "died in the upper chamber without going to a vote." The rating's Newsweek quote was a light paraphrase rather than exact wording (the article reads "Arkansas' Tom Cotton, Alabama's Katie Britt, and North Dakota's Kevin Cramer introduced the Not One More Inch or Acre Act on Wednesday"); it is factually accurate, not fabricated, and I have corrected the source quote to the article's exact text. LEADERSHIP is genuinely established: Britt is a named co-introducer/co-author who led the rollout with her own office's release, not a lone voter or late cosponsor, meeting the CHAMPIONED bar. CHAMPIONED does not overstate the evidence — it correctly stops short of FULL because the ban was never enacted (the 2023 bill died; the reintroduced 2025 measure is pending). Rating upheld.

Your opinion on this assessment(clearly labeled opinion)

Sign in to vote.

Discussion

community opinions

Comments are user opinions — not verdicts. They do not affect the official assessment.

Sign in to join the discussion.

Propose a correction

community accountability

See an error in the promise text, status, significance, or missing source? Submit a sourced correction — a reviewer will evaluate and apply it if accurate. Your submission must cite evidence; unsourced changes are not accepted.

Sign in or create an account to propose a correction.

Debate

sourced community arguments

These are sourced community arguments — not StumpWatch assessments. Each cites a source and is community-contributed; it does not change the official status or rating above.

No arguments yet

Be the first to weigh in. Every argument cites a source and is reviewed before it publishes. Create an account to add one and help keep this promise honest.

Add a sourced argument

Cite a source for your point. Submissions are held for reviewer approval before they appear.

Sign in or create an account to add an argument.

StumpWatch is live, and the record is still growing. Many promises and positions aren’t tracked yet, and some features are still in beta. Add a sourced promise and help keep the record honest.

Help keep the record honest →