“Enact legislation to cap out-of-pocket insulin costs at $35 a month for everyone who needs it, not just Medicare patients (Affordable Insulin Now Act).”
Sources (click to view full provenance)
Propose an edit to this promise's details
Suggest a sourced correction to the promise text, topic, scope, significance, or dates. Changing the promise text requires a source. Your suggestion is reviewed before it changes the record.
Sign in and complete the Contributor Agreement to propose an edit.
Assessments
evidence-backed verdictsThese are sourced verdicts from fact-checkers or community evidence reviews — not opinions.
All three cited sources were fetched and verify. (1) kennedy.senate.gov (PRIMARY) confirms verbatim that the Affordable Insulin Now Act, "which Kennedy and Warnock first introduced in 2023, would ensure that every American—with or without health insurance—has access to a 30-day supply of insulin for no more than $35 per month," and explicitly frames both bills as introduced proposals, not enacted law. (2) WRDW (REPUTABLE_SECONDARY) confirms the verbatim headline "Sen. Warnock backs bill that would cap insulin at $35 for many Americans" and that "If passed, the bill would be expected to take effect at the start of 2027" — i.e., still a proposal; the rating's bracketed language is accurate interpretation, not fabrication. (3) warnock.senate.gov (PRIMARY) confirms the verbatim headline "Senators Reverend Warnock, Kennedy Introduce Bipartisan Legislation to Cap Insulin Costs at $35 a Month for Everyone," dated March 23, 2023, with the confirmed quote "No one should feel forced to put their health or life in danger because they can't afford their insulin." The promise was to ENACT a universal (non-Medicare) $35 cap; primary sources confirm the legislation remains unpassed as of 2026, so the promised result was not achieved. The sources also show genuine, sustained leadership (authored, introduced, reintroduced), which correctly separates this from IGNORED. ATTEMPTED is a conservative, well-supported outcome that does not overstate the evidence; it is upheld.
Your opinion on this assessment(clearly labeled opinion)
Sign in to vote.
Discussion
community opinionsComments are user opinions — not verdicts. They do not affect the official assessment.
Sign in to join the discussion.
Propose a correction
community accountabilitySee an error in the promise text, status, significance, or missing source? Submit a sourced correction — a reviewer will evaluate and apply it if accurate. Your submission must cite evidence; unsourced changes are not accepted.
Sign in or create an account to propose a correction.
Debate
sourced community argumentsThese are sourced community arguments — not StumpWatch assessments. Each cites a source and is community-contributed; it does not change the official status or rating above.
No arguments yet
Be the first to weigh in. Every argument cites a source and is reviewed before it publishes. Create an account to add one and help keep this promise honest.
Add a sourced argument
Cite a source for your point. Submissions are held for reviewer approval before they appear.
Sign in or create an account to add an argument.