Skip to main content

Politicians make promises on their stump — we watch and hold them accountable.

Help keep the record honest →Create an account
Fully KeptReproductive Rights / Health Care

Committed to fight back against any effort to ban birth control in Georgia by supporting the Right to Contraception Act, which would establish a legal right to access birth control and other contraception.

Sources (click to view full provenance)

Propose an edit to this promise's details

Suggest a sourced correction to the promise text, topic, scope, significance, or dates. Changing the promise text requires a source. Your suggestion is reviewed before it changes the record.

Sign in and complete the Contributor Agreement to propose an edit.

Assessments

evidence-backed verdicts

These are sourced verdicts from fact-checkers or community evidence reviews — not opinions.

Fully KeptFact-checker reviewConfidence: 90%

The promise was to fight back against birth-control bans by SUPPORTING the Right to Contraception Act (S.4381). All three cited primary sources were reachable and verified. (1) Senate Roll Call Vote 190 confirms Ossoff voted "Yea" on the cloture motion to proceed to S.4381 on June 5, 2024; cloture was rejected 51-39 (60 needed) via Republican filibuster — a failure outside his control. His personal supportive action (the vote) was delivered. (2) His June 5, 2024 statement condemning Republicans for blocking the Act and vowing to keep fighting was confirmed verbatim. (3) His June 4, 2024 statement urging colleagues to pass the Act, which explicitly references the Right to Contraception Act / S.4381, was confirmed verbatim. FULL is correct because the promised action was his support, which he completed. It is correctly NOT rated CHAMPIONED: the lead sponsor was Sen. Markey and no source shows Ossoff authored or led the effort beyond his vote and statements. No quote was fabricated, no source overstated the evidence.

Your opinion on this assessment(clearly labeled opinion)

Sign in to vote.

Discussion

community opinions

Comments are user opinions — not verdicts. They do not affect the official assessment.

Sign in to join the discussion.

Propose a correction

community accountability

See an error in the promise text, status, significance, or missing source? Submit a sourced correction — a reviewer will evaluate and apply it if accurate. Your submission must cite evidence; unsourced changes are not accepted.

Sign in or create an account to propose a correction.

Debate

sourced community arguments

These are sourced community arguments — not StumpWatch assessments. Each cites a source and is community-contributed; it does not change the official status or rating above.

No arguments yet

Be the first to weigh in. Every argument cites a source and is reviewed before it publishes. Create an account to add one and help keep this promise honest.

Add a sourced argument

Cite a source for your point. Submissions are held for reviewer approval before they appear.

Sign in or create an account to add an argument.

StumpWatch is live, and the record is still growing. Many promises and positions aren’t tracked yet, and some features are still in beta. Add a sourced promise and help keep the record honest.

Help keep the record honest →