“Committed to continue fighting to block federal taxpayer funding for Planned Parenthood.”
Sources (click to view full provenance)
Propose an edit to this promise's details
Suggest a sourced correction to the promise text, topic, scope, significance, or dates. Changing the promise text requires a source. Your suggestion is reviewed before it changes the record.
Sign in and complete the Contributor Agreement to propose an edit.
Assessments
evidence-backed verdictsThese are sourced verdicts from fact-checkers or community evidence reviews — not opinions.
Both cited sources are reachable and support the FULL rating for Jim Banks's promise to continue fighting to block federal taxpayer funding for Planned Parenthood. Source 1 (senate.gov Roll Call Vote 372, PRIMARY) confirms the exact vote heading "On Passage of the Bill (H.R. 1, as Amended)", passage 50-50 with the VP tie-break, and Banks (R-IN) voting Yea — the cited quote matches verbatim. Source 2 (National Health Law Program, reputable secondary) confirms Section 71113 of OBBBA/H.R. 1 blocked federal Medicaid payments to abortion providers/Planned Parenthood for a one-year period, with the cited quote appearing ("forbids them from receiving any payments from the state Medicaid agency that include federal funding for a one year period"). The two sources form a valid chain: Banks voted for H.R. 1, which contained the enacted defund provision targeting Planned Parenthood. This fulfills the promise with an actual enacted outcome. Correctly rated FULL rather than CHAMPIONED — Banks acted as a supporting vote/cosponsor with no documented lead-author or leadership role driving the defunding measure, so no leadership bar applies. The rating does not overstate evidence; the provision's one-year/later-enjoined nature is acknowledged and does not negate that Banks did what he promised. Quotes are accurate, no fabrication, sources support the stated outcome.
Your opinion on this assessment(clearly labeled opinion)
Sign in to vote.
Discussion
community opinionsComments are user opinions — not verdicts. They do not affect the official assessment.
Sign in to join the discussion.
Propose a correction
community accountabilitySee an error in the promise text, status, significance, or missing source? Submit a sourced correction — a reviewer will evaluate and apply it if accurate. Your submission must cite evidence; unsourced changes are not accepted.
Sign in or create an account to propose a correction.
Debate
sourced community argumentsThese are sourced community arguments — not StumpWatch assessments. Each cites a source and is community-contributed; it does not change the official status or rating above.
No arguments yet
Be the first to weigh in. Every argument cites a source and is reviewed before it publishes. Create an account to add one and help keep this promise honest.
Add a sourced argument
Cite a source for your point. Submissions are held for reviewer approval before they appear.
Sign in or create an account to add an argument.