“Support congressional term limits by cosponsoring and voting for the U.S. Term Limits Amendment, capping service at two Senate terms and three House terms. Marshall signed the U.S. Term Limits pledge and cosponsored the amendment (HJR11).”
Sources (click to view full provenance)
Propose an edit to this promise's details
Suggest a sourced correction to the promise text, topic, scope, significance, or dates. Changing the promise text requires a source. Your suggestion is reviewed before it changes the record.
Sign in and complete the Contributor Agreement to propose an edit.
Assessments
evidence-backed verdictsThese are sourced verdicts from fact-checkers or community evidence reviews — not opinions.
All three cited sources are reachable and each quote appears verbatim. The two PRIMARY Ted Cruz Senate press releases confirm Roger Marshall (R-Kan.) cosponsored the congressional term-limits constitutional amendment in both the 118th Congress (Jan 23, 2023 release) and the reintroduced 119th Congress version (Jan 8, 2025 release), each capping service at two six-year Senate terms and three two-year House terms — the exact caps in the promise. The REPUTABLE_SECONDARY U.S. Term Limits source confirms Marshall signed the U.S. Term Limits pledge (plaque awarded June 8, 2023). The promise's actionable core — signing the pledge and cosponsoring the amendment with those caps — is fully documented. The promise text's "HJR11" is U.S. Term Limits' shorthand for the House measure; as a Senator, Marshall's actual cosponsorship is on the identical Senate companion (S.J.Res.2 in the 118th, S.J.Res.1 in the 119th), a labeling nuance rather than a substantive gap. Correctly not CHAMPIONED: Cruz authored and introduced the amendment; Marshall is a cosponsor, not the lead/driver, with no evidence of leadership beyond cosponsoring and signing the pledge. The "voting for" component has had no opportunity — the resolutions have never reached a floor vote — which is outside Marshall's control and does not undercut FULL. FULL is supported and does not overstate the evidence.
Your opinion on this assessment(clearly labeled opinion)
Sign in to vote.
Discussion
community opinionsComments are user opinions — not verdicts. They do not affect the official assessment.
Sign in to join the discussion.
Propose a correction
community accountabilitySee an error in the promise text, status, significance, or missing source? Submit a sourced correction — a reviewer will evaluate and apply it if accurate. Your submission must cite evidence; unsourced changes are not accepted.
Sign in or create an account to propose a correction.
Debate
sourced community argumentsThese are sourced community arguments — not StumpWatch assessments. Each cites a source and is community-contributed; it does not change the official status or rating above.
No arguments yet
Be the first to weigh in. Every argument cites a source and is reviewed before it publishes. Create an account to add one and help keep this promise honest.
Add a sourced argument
Cite a source for your point. Submissions are held for reviewer approval before they appear.
Sign in or create an account to add an argument.