Independently re-verified. (1) The named vehicle does not exist in Alsobrooks' Congress: I pulled the complete GovTrack mirror of Congress.gov bill data for the 119th Congress and scanned every title -- all 5,020 Senate bills (total_count 5,020, retrieved 5,020) and all 9,788 House bills (retrieved via ascending + descending + number<=3800 passes, full coverage of H.R. 1-9,794) -- and ZERO bills contain 'Freedom to Vote' in the title. The Freedom to Vote Act was never reintroduced in 2025-26, so literal cosponsorship of that bill was impossible; a search of alsobrooks.senate.gov for 'Freedom to Vote' returns only her S.2912 press release. (2) The prior rating's supporting citations are all REAL and check out: alsobrooks.senate.gov press release (HTTP 200, live) confirms she introduced S.2912; GovTrack confirms she is the lead sponsor of S.2912 Deceptive Practices and Voter Intimidation Prevention Act of 2025 (introduced 09/18/2025), an actual component title of the Freedom to Vote Act; and the cosponsor pages confirm she is an ORIGINAL cosponsor of S.2523 (John R. Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act of 2025), S.2822 (Register America to Vote Act of 2025), S.2994 (Voter Purge Protection Act), S.4369 (Absentee and Mail Voter Protection Act) and S.2838 (Protecting Our Democracy Act), plus a cosponsor of S.1887 (Vote at Home Act of 2025) as of June 3, 2025. (3) MATERIAL CORRECTION to the prior rationale: it claimed she had NOT delivered on the campaign-finance plank. That is wrong -- the GovTrack cosponsor page for S.3991, the DISCLOSE Act of 2026, lists 'Alsobrooks, Angela [D-MD, 2025-2030] ... Original Cosponsor'. So three of the four planks she named (voting rights, campaign finance, ethics) are covered by legislation she has personally sponsored or originally cosponsored. (4) The one real gap is anti-gerrymandering: the sole Senate redistricting-reform vehicle in the 119th, S.2885 Redistricting Reform Act of 2025 (Padilla), has only Schiff, King and Warnock as cosponsors -- Alsobrooks is not among them (verified by parsing the full cosponsor table). Applying the same standard I would apply to a Republican who promised an omnibus that was never reintroduced: leading one component bill and originally cosponsoring the rest of the package is real, verifiable delivery on most but not all of the promise, and short of driving the promised omnibus itself. That is PARTIAL, not CHAMPIONED (she did not introduce or lead the Freedom to Vote Act), not ATTEMPTED (she led a bill, not merely a supporting vote), and not NO_OPPORTUNITY (she plainly had and took opportunities to act on the substance). Confidence raised from 0.68 to 0.78 because the bill-title census is now exhaustive in both chambers and every cosponsorship was checked against the roll rather than asserted.