Skip to main content

Politicians make promises on their stump — we watch and hold them accountable.

Help keep the record honest →Create an account
PartialHealth Care / Drug Prices

Alsobrooks supports placing caps on total out-of-pocket expenses and expanding the federal government's ability to negotiate prescription drug prices.

Sources (click to view full provenance)

Propose an edit to this promise's details

Suggest a sourced correction to the promise text, topic, scope, significance, or dates. Changing the promise text requires a source. Your suggestion is reviewed before it changes the record.

Sign in and complete the Contributor Agreement to propose an edit.

Assessments

evidence-backed verdicts

These are sourced verdicts from fact-checkers or community evidence reviews — not opinions.

PartialFact-checker reviewConfidence: 60%

Verified: Alsobrooks is a cosponsor of S.529, the Capping Prescription Costs Act of 2025 (Warnock lead sponsor), which caps out-of-pocket prescription costs at $2,000/individual and $4,000/family for the privately insured — real, accomplished supportive action on the out-of-pocket-cap prong. The negotiation-expansion prong is weaker: she is not a lead/cosponsor of the dedicated Medicare-negotiation-expansion bills and acted only through defeated budget amendments and a defensive point-of-order, so support there is general rather than substantive. Nothing enacted (first-term senator in the Democratic minority). She therefore did PART of the promise. Not CHAMPIONED — she is a cosponsor, not the lead author (Warnock leads S.529). PARTIAL over ATTEMPTED because the cosponsorship is genuine accomplished action on one prong rather than a whole-promise effort that merely failed; confidence 0.6 reflects the real PARTIAL/ATTEMPTED boundary given her short minority-party tenure, not verification doubt.

Your opinion on this assessment(clearly labeled opinion)

Sign in to vote.

Discussion

community opinions

Comments are user opinions — not verdicts. They do not affect the official assessment.

Sign in to join the discussion.

Propose a correction

community accountability

See an error in the promise text, status, significance, or missing source? Submit a sourced correction — a reviewer will evaluate and apply it if accurate. Your submission must cite evidence; unsourced changes are not accepted.

Sign in or create an account to propose a correction.

Debate

sourced community arguments

These are sourced community arguments — not StumpWatch assessments. Each cites a source and is community-contributed; it does not change the official status or rating above.

No arguments yet

Be the first to weigh in. Every argument cites a source and is reviewed before it publishes. Create an account to add one and help keep this promise honest.

Add a sourced argument

Cite a source for your point. Submissions are held for reviewer approval before they appear.

Sign in or create an account to add an argument.

StumpWatch is live, and the record is still growing. Many promises and positions aren’t tracked yet, and some features are still in beta. Add a sourced promise and help keep the record honest.

Help keep the record honest →