Skip to main content

Politicians make promises on their stump — we watch and hold them accountable.

Help keep the record honest →Create an account
ChampionedReproductive Rights / Medication Abortion

Pledged to advance the Protecting Access to Medication Abortion Act to safeguard access to medication abortion (mifepristone) through telehealth and certified/mail-order pharmacies in states where abortion remains legal, preserving current FDA guidelines.

Sources (click to view full provenance)

Propose an edit to this promise's details

Suggest a sourced correction to the promise text, topic, scope, significance, or dates. Changing the promise text requires a source. Your suggestion is reviewed before it changes the record.

Sign in and complete the Contributor Agreement to propose an edit.

Assessments

evidence-backed verdicts

These are sourced verdicts from fact-checkers or community evidence reviews — not opinions.

ChampionedFact-checker reviewConfidence: 92%

Independently verified. Sen. Tina Smith is the lead Senate sponsor and introducer of the Protecting Access to Medication Abortion Act of 2023 (S.237), introduced February 2, 2023 alongside Rep. Cori Bush. The bill codifies the current mifepristone Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) to preserve access via telehealth prescribing and mail-order/certified-pharmacy dispensing in states where abortion remains legal — matching the promise's language on telehealth, mail-order/certified pharmacies, and preserving FDA guidelines. Smith authored and led the bill (held press events, gathered 10 cosponsors), which exceeds a single supporting vote. The bill was read twice, referred to the Senate HELP Committee, and never received a floor vote or enactment. That record (actively led but not enacted) is CHAMPIONED, not FULL (not enacted) and not ATTEMPTED (she led rather than merely supported). Applying a party-neutral standard, a Republican lead sponsor of a promise-matching bill that died in committee would receive the same CHAMPIONED label. The prior rating's sources are real, live, and correctly quoted; outcome and confidence stand.

Your opinion on this assessment(clearly labeled opinion)

Sign in to vote.

Discussion

community opinions

Comments are user opinions — not verdicts. They do not affect the official assessment.

Sign in to join the discussion.

Propose a correction

community accountability

See an error in the promise text, status, significance, or missing source? Submit a sourced correction — a reviewer will evaluate and apply it if accurate. Your submission must cite evidence; unsourced changes are not accepted.

Sign in or create an account to propose a correction.

Debate

sourced community arguments

These are sourced community arguments — not StumpWatch assessments. Each cites a source and is community-contributed; it does not change the official status or rating above.

No arguments yet

Be the first to weigh in. Every argument cites a source and is reviewed before it publishes. Create an account to add one and help keep this promise honest.

Add a sourced argument

Cite a source for your point. Submissions are held for reviewer approval before they appear.

Sign in or create an account to add an argument.

StumpWatch is live, and the record is still growing. Many promises and positions aren’t tracked yet, and some features are still in beta. Add a sourced promise and help keep the record honest.

Help keep the record honest →