“Committed to keep pushing the Mental Health Services for Students Act to help schools partner with local mental-health providers and place mental-health services on-site for K-12 students.”
Sources (click to view full provenance)
Propose an edit to this promise's details
Suggest a sourced correction to the promise text, topic, scope, significance, or dates. Changing the promise text requires a source. Your suggestion is reviewed before it changes the record.
Sign in and complete the Contributor Agreement to propose an edit.
Assessments
evidence-backed verdictsThese are sourced verdicts from fact-checkers or community evidence reviews — not opinions.
All three cited sources are reachable and directly support the ATTEMPTED outcome for THIS promise. BillTrack50 confirms verbatim: S.1884 "Mental Health Services for Students Act of 2023," Primary Sponsor Tina Smith (D), Current Status "Dead 01/03/2025," Latest Action "Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions (06/08/2023)" — establishing a normal-process failure (referral was the only and final action; no hearing, markup, or vote). The Murphy Senate press release (June 12, 2023) confirms Murphy and Smith reintroduced the bill and contains Smith's quoted statement verbatim, including the original "services health" typo. The Smith Senate press release (June 9, 2023) confirms she co-led the reintroduction with Murphy to strengthen school-based mental health services for K-12 students via school/provider partnerships and on-site services — the page's own language ("would help schools partner with local mental health providers to establish on-site mental health services for students") maps precisely onto the promise text. Together these show genuine, good-faith, leadership-level effort (primary sponsor reintroducing the bill = "keep pushing") that failed within the normal legislative process (majority leadership never scheduled it and it expired with the 118th Congress). That is textbook ATTEMPTED. The rating does not claim CHAMPIONED, so there is no leadership-overstatement to police; ATTEMPTED is if anything the conservative call, since the bill never advanced past introduction/referral. No source is unreachable, no quote is fabricated, and the outcome does not overstate the evidence.
Your opinion on this assessment(clearly labeled opinion)
Sign in to vote.
Discussion
community opinionsComments are user opinions — not verdicts. They do not affect the official assessment.
Sign in to join the discussion.
Propose a correction
community accountabilitySee an error in the promise text, status, significance, or missing source? Submit a sourced correction — a reviewer will evaluate and apply it if accurate. Your submission must cite evidence; unsourced changes are not accepted.
Sign in or create an account to propose a correction.
Debate
sourced community argumentsThese are sourced community arguments — not StumpWatch assessments. Each cites a source and is community-contributed; it does not change the official status or rating above.
No arguments yet
Be the first to weigh in. Every argument cites a source and is reviewed before it publishes. Create an account to add one and help keep this promise honest.
Add a sourced argument
Cite a source for your point. Submissions are held for reviewer approval before they appear.
Sign in or create an account to add an argument.