“Committed to continue fighting in the Senate for federal clean-energy policies — national clean energy targets, more clean-energy research funding, extended clean and renewable energy tax credits, and support for biofuels.”
Sources (click to view full provenance)
Propose an edit to this promise's details
Suggest a sourced correction to the promise text, topic, scope, significance, or dates. Changing the promise text requires a source. Your suggestion is reviewed before it changes the record.
Sign in and complete the Contributor Agreement to propose an edit.
Assessments
evidence-backed verdictsThese are sourced verdicts from fact-checkers or community evidence reviews — not opinions.
All four cited sources are reachable, support the outcome, and their quotes appear verbatim. Leadership (not merely "fighting") is documented across the promise's components: (1) NATIONAL CLEAN ENERGY TARGETS — the EDF release confirms Smith introduced/lead-sponsored the Clean Energy Standard Act (federal CES to net-zero electricity by midcentury), and E&E News verbatim calls her "the architect of one of the most aggressive climate ideas in years, the Clean Electricity Performance Program"; both are genuine authorship/lead-sponsorship, though neither became law. (2) CLEAN/RENEWABLE ENERGY TAX CREDITS — her Senate accomplishments page (verbatim) states she "played a key role in securing major climate and energy provisions in the Inflation Reduction Act, including tax credits for clean energy technologies, direct pay ... and funding for REAP and for rural electric cooperatives," and Senate Roll Call Vote 325 confirms "Smith (D-MN), Yea" on H.R. 5376 (the IRA, passed 50-50 with VP tiebreak) — enacted. (3) BIOFUELS — the same page confirms a 10-year biofuel-credit extension and new sustainable aviation fuel credits — enacted. Leadership is strongest on the components that did NOT become law (CES/CEPP), while the enacted tax-credit/biofuel role rests partly on her own office's "key role" framing, corroborated by her Agriculture/Energy committee seat and the roll-call vote. The rating holds; the only defensible downgrade — weighting the legislative failure of CES/CEPP more heavily — would land at PARTIAL, not UNRATABLE, hence high but not maximal confidence.
Your opinion on this assessment(clearly labeled opinion)
Sign in to vote.
Discussion
community opinionsComments are user opinions — not verdicts. They do not affect the official assessment.
Sign in to join the discussion.
Propose a correction
community accountabilitySee an error in the promise text, status, significance, or missing source? Submit a sourced correction — a reviewer will evaluate and apply it if accurate. Your submission must cite evidence; unsourced changes are not accepted.
Sign in or create an account to propose a correction.
Debate
sourced community argumentsThese are sourced community arguments — not StumpWatch assessments. Each cites a source and is community-contributed; it does not change the official status or rating above.
No arguments yet
Be the first to weigh in. Every argument cites a source and is reviewed before it publishes. Create an account to add one and help keep this promise honest.
Add a sourced argument
Cite a source for your point. Submissions are held for reviewer approval before they appear.
Sign in or create an account to add an argument.