Skip to main content

Politicians make promises on their stump — we watch and hold them accountable.

Help keep the record honest →Create an account
Fully KeptCongressional leadership

Committed during his Senate campaign not to support Mitch McConnell as Senate Republican leader.

Sources (click to view full provenance)

Propose an edit to this promise's details

Suggest a sourced correction to the promise text, topic, scope, significance, or dates. Changing the promise text requires a source. Your suggestion is reviewed before it changes the record.

Sign in and complete the Contributor Agreement to propose an edit.

Assessments

evidence-backed verdicts

These are sourced verdicts from fact-checkers or community evidence reviews — not opinions.

Fully KeptFact-checker reviewConfidence: 83%

All three cited sources were fetched and verified. (1) Fox News and (2) Newstalk KZRG both document that Schmitt, after winning the Nov 8, 2022 general election, publicly refused to support McConnell as Senate Republican leader, reaffirming his campaign-era position ("I don't endorse him for leadership"; preferred Cruz or Lee). Both attribute the exact quote "I said what I said, and I stand by those comments" to Schmitt when asked how he would vote in the leadership election. The KZRG headline matches verbatim. (3) Wikipedia confirms the mechanism/opportunity: voting in the Nov 16, 2022 leadership election was limited to those expected to serve in the 118th Congress (i.e., senators-elect like Schmitt), Rick Scott challenged McConnell, and McConnell won 37-10-1. The verified evidence supports FULL: Schmitt made the commitment during his campaign, publicly maintained it through the eve of the vote, and there is no evidence he ever backed McConnell. The only caveat — the leadership ballot was secret, so his individual vote is not in a recorded roll call — is appropriately reflected in the sub-certain 0.83 confidence rather than a downgrade, since the promise concerns a public stance he demonstrably held. No source was unreachable, no quote was fabricated, and the outcome does not overstate the evidence.

Your opinion on this assessment(clearly labeled opinion)

Sign in to vote.

Discussion

community opinions

Comments are user opinions — not verdicts. They do not affect the official assessment.

Sign in to join the discussion.

Propose a correction

community accountability

See an error in the promise text, status, significance, or missing source? Submit a sourced correction — a reviewer will evaluate and apply it if accurate. Your submission must cite evidence; unsourced changes are not accepted.

Sign in or create an account to propose a correction.

Debate

sourced community arguments

These are sourced community arguments — not StumpWatch assessments. Each cites a source and is community-contributed; it does not change the official status or rating above.

No arguments yet

Be the first to weigh in. Every argument cites a source and is reviewed before it publishes. Create an account to add one and help keep this promise honest.

Add a sourced argument

Cite a source for your point. Submissions are held for reviewer approval before they appear.

Sign in or create an account to add an argument.

StumpWatch is live, and the record is still growing. Many promises and positions aren’t tracked yet, and some features are still in beta. Add a sourced promise and help keep the record honest.

Help keep the record honest →