Skip to main content

Politicians make promises on their stump — we watch and hold them accountable.

Help keep the record honest →Create an account
ChampionedReproductive rights

Pledged to continue fighting to protect reproductive rights and to pass the Women's Health Protection Act, legislation to codify the protections of Roe v. Wade into federal law.

Sources (click to view full provenance)

Propose an edit to this promise's details

Suggest a sourced correction to the promise text, topic, scope, significance, or dates. Changing the promise text requires a source. Your suggestion is reviewed before it changes the record.

Sign in and complete the Contributor Agreement to propose an edit.

Assessments

evidence-backed verdicts

These are sourced verdicts from fact-checkers or community evidence reviews — not opinions.

ChampionedFact-checker reviewConfidence: 85%

All four cited sources are reachable and each supports the CHAMPIONED outcome for this promise; every quoted string appears verbatim on its page. Source 1 (rosen.senate.gov, May 11, 2022) confirms Rosen's floor speech urging WHPA passage, with the quoted sentence present word-for-word and the added context that she helped introduce the WHPA "because it is the best option we have to codify Roe versus Wade into law." Source 2 (democrats.senate.gov) confirms the S.4132 cloture vote "Not invoked: 49-51." Source 3 (rosen.senate.gov, March 8, 2023) confirms she and Cortez Masto reintroduced the WHPA to codify Roe, with the quoted line present. Source 4 (rosen.senate.gov, July 10, 2024) confirms she helped introduce and voted for the Reproductive Freedom for Women Act, with the quoted line present. Together these document leadership beyond a single vote — lead sponsorship/reintroduction, repeated floor advocacy, and multiple aligned votes — which is the definition of CHAMPIONED for the promise's dominant "continue fighting to protect reproductive rights" commitment. The rating does not overstate the evidence: it explicitly acknowledges the WHPA itself never passed (repeated failed cloture votes, a filibuster outcome outside her individual control) rather than claiming the bill became law. Applying the same standard I would for the opposite party, the outcome is well-grounded and not inflated, so I uphold CHAMPIONED.

Your opinion on this assessment(clearly labeled opinion)

Sign in to vote.

Discussion

community opinions

Comments are user opinions — not verdicts. They do not affect the official assessment.

Sign in to join the discussion.

Propose a correction

community accountability

See an error in the promise text, status, significance, or missing source? Submit a sourced correction — a reviewer will evaluate and apply it if accurate. Your submission must cite evidence; unsourced changes are not accepted.

Sign in or create an account to propose a correction.

Debate

sourced community arguments

These are sourced community arguments — not StumpWatch assessments. Each cites a source and is community-contributed; it does not change the official status or rating above.

No arguments yet

Be the first to weigh in. Every argument cites a source and is reviewed before it publishes. Create an account to add one and help keep this promise honest.

Add a sourced argument

Cite a source for your point. Submissions are held for reviewer approval before they appear.

Sign in or create an account to add an argument.

StumpWatch is live, and the record is still growing. Many promises and positions aren’t tracked yet, and some features are still in beta. Add a sourced promise and help keep the record honest.

Help keep the record honest →