“Get the federal fiscal house in order by passing a balanced budget amendment while protecting Social Security and Medicare benefits.”
Sources (click to view full provenance)
Propose an edit to this promise's details
Suggest a sourced correction to the promise text, topic, scope, significance, or dates. Changing the promise text requires a source. Your suggestion is reviewed before it changes the record.
Sign in and complete the Contributor Agreement to propose an edit.
Assessments
evidence-backed verdictsThese are sourced verdicts from fact-checkers or community evidence reviews — not opinions.
The promise's defining action is passing/advancing a balanced budget amendment (BBA) while protecting Social Security and Medicare. Since taking office (Jan 3, 2025), McCormick took no action toward the promised mechanism: he introduced no BBA and is not a cosponsor of the Senate BBA vehicle S.J.Res.97 (119th Cong.), a joint resolution proposing a balanced budget amendment sponsored by Husted with Lummis as cosponsor. An independent review of his record (Pennsylvania Independent) found he cosponsored 24 bills, and none would balance the budget. Meanwhile his signature fiscal vote, YES on the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (H.R.1), is projected by CBO to increase the deficit by about $3.3 trillion over the decade, cutting against getting the fiscal house in order (the bill did not directly cut SS/Medicare benefits, so that constraint was passively honored). Because he had a genuine available opportunity to advance a BBA and did nothing on it, the outcome is IGNORED. Confidence is moderate: it is early in a six-year term, a BBA is structurally near-impossible for any single senator to deliver, and he made one tangential restraint gesture (cosponsoring the non-binding S.Res.654) - but on the specific promised action his effort to date is zero, and his largest fiscal vote worsened the deficit.
Your opinion on this assessment(clearly labeled opinion)
Sign in to vote.
Discussion
community opinionsComments are user opinions — not verdicts. They do not affect the official assessment.
Sign in to join the discussion.
Propose a correction
community accountabilitySee an error in the promise text, status, significance, or missing source? Submit a sourced correction — a reviewer will evaluate and apply it if accurate. Your submission must cite evidence; unsourced changes are not accepted.
Sign in or create an account to propose a correction.
Debate
sourced community argumentsThese are sourced community arguments — not StumpWatch assessments. Each cites a source and is community-contributed; it does not change the official status or rating above.
No arguments yet
Be the first to weigh in. Every argument cites a source and is reviewed before it publishes. Create an account to add one and help keep this promise honest.
Add a sourced argument
Cite a source for your point. Submissions are held for reviewer approval before they appear.
Sign in or create an account to add an argument.