Adversarial re-check: all three sources in the prior rating are real, live, and accurately quoted. (1) I independently fetched McCormick's Senate op-ed page and confirmed the verbatim sentence 'I have vowed to serve no more than two terms in the Senate.' (April 17, 2025; originally Pittsburgh Post-Gazette) — the pledge is reaffirmed in office, not merely on the 2024 campaign trail. (2) I independently fetched the enrolled introduced text of S.J.Res.48 on congress.gov and confirmed McCormick is the sponsor, introduction date April 10, 2025, Senators limited to 'two six-year terms,' House to 'six two-year terms,' and a grandfather clause reading 'This article shall not apply to any person who served as a Representative or as a Senator during any Congress occurring before the One Hundred Eighteenth Congress.' McCormick was sworn in for the 119th Congress, so the amendment he authored would legally bind him — it is self-binding, not an exemption-shielded gesture. Status: referred to Senate Judiciary, no further action. (3) The press release is live and its McCormick quotes ('We need constant change and new blood for our democracy to work') are accurate; note it does NOT itself contain the personal two-term pledge, and the prior rationale correctly attributed that pledge to the op-ed rather than the release. The congress.gov bill landing page returns 403 to automated fetch (bot-blocking, not a dead link); the same record is confirmed via the bill-text URL on the same domain, added below. Outcome test applied neutrally: the literal promise is personal conduct whose only true test — declining to seek a third term — cannot occur until roughly the 2036 cycle, which argues for NO_OPPORTUNITY. I rejected that because it would be factually false to say he had no opportunity to act: he took a concrete, verifiable, self-binding legislative step in year one of term one. I also rejected ATTEMPTED (+0.25) because the rubric's axis separating ATTEMPTED from CHAMPIONED is degree of personal leadership, not degree of success — McCormick was lead sponsor, not a supporting vote, and CHAMPIONED explicitly covers efforts that are 'not fully enacted.' I checked for double-counting: no separate 'push for term limits' promise is tracked for McCormick in this pool (his only other tracked promises concern tax/cost-of-living and China), so S.J.Res.48 is not being credited twice. Same-standard check: a Democrat who pledged a self-imposed two-term limit, then authored a constitutional amendment that would bind them and publicly reaffirmed the pledge in office, would receive CHAMPIONED on this record; I would not lower it for party. FULL and PARTIAL are wrong because nothing is fulfilled — CHAMPIONED (+0.75) credits leadership on the commitment, not compliance with it. Confidence held at 0.6 rather than raised: the affirmative acts are certain, but the core personal pledge remains untestable for roughly a decade and the amendment died in committee, so the label rests on directional leadership evidence rather than on performance.