“Introduced legislation to stop the outgoing administration from selling off taxpayer-purchased border wall materials, saying it would protect the ability to secure the southern border.”
Sources (click to view full provenance)
Propose an edit to this promise's details
Suggest a sourced correction to the promise text, topic, scope, significance, or dates. Changing the promise text requires a source. Your suggestion is reviewed before it changes the record.
Sign in and complete the Contributor Agreement to propose an edit.
Assessments
evidence-backed verdictsThese are sourced verdicts from fact-checkers or community evidence reviews — not opinions.
Verified. The promise was to introduce legislation stopping the outgoing (Biden) administration from selling off taxpayer-purchased border wall materials, framed as protecting the ability to secure the southern border. Hagerty did exactly this and LED it as sole author. (1) S.5542 (118th Cong.): I could not fetch congress.gov or GovTrack directly (both return HTTP 403 to automated fetchers — a bot-block, not a dead link), but the source is genuinely reachable and its every factual claim is independently corroborated: WebSearch surfaced the congress.gov page with the exact verbatim title cited, and BillTrack50 confirms Sponsor Bill Hagerty (R) with "Sponsors (1)"/none listed (= 0 cosponsors), referral to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, and the "Read twice and referred" action on 12/16/2024 (dead 01/03/2025 at end of Congress). (2) The Hagerty press release is reachable and contains the cited quote verbatim, confirming he introduced the bill himself. (3) Fox News is reachable and contains the cited lede verbatim and names Hagerty. LEADERSHIP test for CHAMPIONED is met: he is the sole sponsor/author (0 cosponsors = his own initiative), not merely a voter or co-sponsor, and he amplified it via an official press release and public promotion — authorship plus championing, so CHAMPIONED holds rather than FULL/PARTIAL. Context not affecting the rating: the bill died in committee and the underlying sale was already under a mandated contract, but the promise was to introduce/champion the legislation, which he fully did.
Your opinion on this assessment(clearly labeled opinion)
Sign in to vote.
Discussion
community opinionsComments are user opinions — not verdicts. They do not affect the official assessment.
Sign in to join the discussion.
Propose a correction
community accountabilitySee an error in the promise text, status, significance, or missing source? Submit a sourced correction — a reviewer will evaluate and apply it if accurate. Your submission must cite evidence; unsourced changes are not accepted.
Sign in or create an account to propose a correction.
Debate
sourced community argumentsThese are sourced community arguments — not StumpWatch assessments. Each cites a source and is community-contributed; it does not change the official status or rating above.
No arguments yet
Be the first to weigh in. Every argument cites a source and is reviewed before it publishes. Create an account to add one and help keep this promise honest.
Add a sourced argument
Cite a source for your point. Submissions are held for reviewer approval before they appear.
Sign in or create an account to add an argument.