“Pledged to continue protecting Utah public lands from federal overreach and outside intrusion as a senator.”
Sources (click to view full provenance)
Propose an edit to this promise's details
Suggest a sourced correction to the promise text, topic, scope, significance, or dates. Changing the promise text requires a source. Your suggestion is reviewed before it changes the record.
Sign in and complete the Contributor Agreement to propose an edit.
Assessments
evidence-backed verdictsThese are sourced verdicts from fact-checkers or community evidence reviews — not opinions.
All three cited PRIMARY (official U.S. Senate) sources are reachable, on-point, and each documents genuine legislative LEADERSHIP by Curtis (sponsorship/co-lead, not mere votes) matching the promise's two prongs. FEDERAL OVERREACH: (1) Curtis co-introduced with Sen. Lee a Congressional Review Act resolution overturning the NPS rule and restoring ORV access in Glen Canyon National Recreation Area, and that resolution PASSED the Senate — a concrete enacted outcome; the source confirms verbatim the quote ending "...not dictated by Washington bureaucrats." (2) Curtis introduced/co-introduced with Sen. Lee the "Ending Presidential Overreach on Public Lands Act" to curb unilateral presidential monument designations; quote confirmed verbatim. OUTSIDE INTRUSION: (3) Curtis co-introduced with Lee and Rep. Kennedy the Natural Asset Company Prohibition Act to block Wall Street/foreign control of Utah lands; quote confirmed verbatim. Leadership beyond voting on both prongs, with one Senate passage, supports CHAMPIONED. Not FULL/higher because the promise is ongoing and the two flagship bills remain unenacted; confidence held at 0.85.
Your opinion on this assessment(clearly labeled opinion)
Sign in to vote.
Discussion
community opinionsComments are user opinions — not verdicts. They do not affect the official assessment.
Sign in to join the discussion.
Propose a correction
community accountabilitySee an error in the promise text, status, significance, or missing source? Submit a sourced correction — a reviewer will evaluate and apply it if accurate. Your submission must cite evidence; unsourced changes are not accepted.
Sign in or create an account to propose a correction.
Debate
sourced community argumentsThese are sourced community arguments — not StumpWatch assessments. Each cites a source and is community-contributed; it does not change the official status or rating above.
No arguments yet
Be the first to weigh in. Every argument cites a source and is reviewed before it publishes. Create an account to add one and help keep this promise honest.
Add a sourced argument
Cite a source for your point. Submissions are held for reviewer approval before they appear.
Sign in or create an account to add an argument.